Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • Activism, News, & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • Activism, News, & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Activism, News, & Politics

Protest Photography, Trauma Porn, and the Surveillance State

  • June 9, 2020
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • Erin Davis

In America, the fact that we live in a surveillance state has literally become meme-able material: yes, FBI man that lurks on my computer as I type this, I’m talking to you. But really, there’s a darker truth behind this playful, internet-wide subversive nod to the violating practices of our government. And in the wake of the civil unrest boiling over across the country, all eyes are on us, none more so than our own government. 

Automatic license plate readers can track any cars in the vicinity of a protest or demonstration, and law enforcement can utilize both facial recognition and wireless interception to identify and harvest sensitive information. Call logs and SMS messages can be easily ripped from your idle devices, and the FBI is demanding people report and identify violent protesters captured on video.

Protests have erupted in every region of our nation in the wake of the murder of George Floyd; in response, the government is not only enabling law enforcement to drive vehicles through crowds of protesters and fire on peaceful demonstrators, they’re also violating every right to privacy in the book to track, threaten, and prosecute protesters. 

Small armies of militarized police have been deployed in cities across the country; while some have used the chance to embark in a tad bit of abhorrent performative activism, these productions only thinly mask the extensive brutality unleashed on demonstrators. Amidst reports of mass police violence against protesters, the scariest weapon that law enforcement wields may not even be the tear gas, tasers, mace, bullets, or literal vehicles arming the onslaught. Instead, it is the weaponization of private information. 

Even bringing a cellphone to a protest is a risk—and a sizable one, at that. If arrested, any devices on you are completely subject to search and inspection. To take it even further, sensitive information broadcasted from your phone can be pried from your mobile carriers at any time, and accidentally connecting to an IMSI catcher, a device used by cops that basically acts as a cellphone tower, will allow them to collect your private data. It can be used on entire crowds in one swoop. 

All this is why we must take extra steps to protect ourselves, because it is an assault from all fronts; turn off your GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth; activate airplane mode; and, I cannot stress this enough, turn off facial and thumbprint recognition on your phone. This puts you in a very vulnerable position to cops who are just one unnecessarily forceful manhandling away from gaining access to your device. 

It’s time to admit that this constant threat to privacy is not meme-able anymore, no longer a cynically humorous shrug at an abusive authority; we live in a surveillance state and it is terrifying. Not only does it facilitate the persecution and disruption of protesters and demonstrations, it also enables retaliation. 

And yet, in spite of all of the dangers that having a culture built on living online may cultivate, our digital generation has utilized this tool as a mechanism of activism, organization, and accountability. We have turned the tables; we have subverted the system by amplifying our collective voice in a public sphere. We are protesting now because of the documentation of an abhorrent act of violence. When it hit the digital platforms we engage with daily, it set the world on fire. 

We are speaking directly to the people. We have demanded the world’s attention; know that they are watching. Know that some are looking for any slip-up, any mistake. All media platforms are being monitored. So are the videos collected from police cams, drone footage, and stolen data. Know that your face can show up anywhere. The revolution may not be televised, but it is being surveilled; this is an era of digital policing. 

I implore you to think about all the brave people joining us in our fight that face unparalleled risk; they may be undocmented, have a criminal record, be queer-identifying or gender-nonconforming. Be mindful of what photos you take and how you store them, both ones you share and ones you don’t; be wary of live-streaming, and the risk it carries—you don’t know what vulnerable faces you may capture, even if only for a split second. Understand that as police violence escalates, so will the violation of our private information, weaponized to systemically root out protesters, starting with the most unprotected. 

These are the platforms where we are organizing, where we are documenting an event that history will remember; we can’t be anything less than fiercely vigilant in how we are utilizing it, while protecting each other in the process. Yes—even if that means blurring faces in photos, or deleting protest content all together. It is not censorship or whitewashing; it is making difficult decisions to defend civil liberties. 

Though there is a human and photojournalistic value in showing hard, challenging, and graphic images to fully tell a story, don’t do so for the purposes of trauma porn, or in spite of the sacrifices involuntarily forced onto those who never wanted to be in your photo in the first place. 

Right now, we are all documentarians, journalists, and activists in our own right. Every single day, in every action to uplift, archive, and spread awareness, we are honoring the memory of George Floyd, and the many, many stories like his. In these roles, we are also bound by not inflicting further harm in our advocacy; we have to be better. We cannot report carelessly, endanger lives, or make political art while not caring about the political consequences. 

Please, be aware that taking a stand is a risk; please be aware that, when you photograph someone’s uncovered face, you make that risk greater. Don’t endanger black lives, even if done in an effort to defend them.

 

By Erin Davis

Photo by Alda Amer for Axios

Related Topics
  • black lives matter
  • Erin Davis
  • protests
  • racism
  • surveillance
  • trauma porn
Previous Article
  • Activism, News, & Politics

Knowing Your White Privilege—and Mobilizing It

  • June 9, 2020
  • Colette Bernheim
View Post
Next Article
  • Activism, News, & Politics

When Riots Become Therapy

  • June 15, 2020
  • Simisola Fagbemi
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

r/WallStreetBets Was Never David

  • February 24, 2021
  • Jill Risberg
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

The $1,400 Question (and the Unwanted Unity in Its Answer)

  • February 18, 2021
  • Sophia Moore
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

The Impossibilities of Joe Biden’s COVID-Riddled America

  • January 31, 2021
  • Kenneth Kim
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

The Ideology Behind Anti-Vax Mommy Bloggers and QAnon Followers 

  • January 25, 2021
  • Cierra Bettens
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

Why Do Leftist Men Still Hate Women?

  • January 20, 2021
  • Sarah Bennett
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

Trump’s America Is Nothing New, But I Hope We Learn From It.

  • January 8, 2021
  • Simisola Fagbemi
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

The Day Georgia Made History, Again.

  • January 7, 2021
  • Raven Yamamoto
View Post
  • Activism, News, & Politics

In Defense of Compulsory Voting

  • November 12, 2020
  • Madeleine Burgess

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    Sexual Empowerment or Reckless Endangerment?
    • March 2, 2021
  • 2
    What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?
    • March 1, 2021
  • 3
    Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain
    • February 28, 2021
  • 4
    “Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020
    • February 28, 2021
  • 5
    Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino
    • February 27, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Why You Should Reject Music Elitism
    • February 26, 2021
  • Middle School Ends, But “Pen15” Is Forever 
    • February 26, 2021
  • How TV About Getting Lost Taught Me About Survival
    • February 25, 2021
Categories
  • Activism, News, & Politics (69)
  • Culture & Entertainment (141)
  • Fashion & Beauty (31)
  • Life (133)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (68)
Search
Instagram
OnlyFans, selling worn underwear, sex work—are these acts of sexual empowerment or reckless endangerment? As Modesty Sanchez writes, “Because OnlyFans creators are portrayed as entrepreneurs taking control of their image and brand, the role that the platform itself plays is often obscured and dismissed, especially since the company prefers to hide behind the feminist, sex-positive glow emanating from the sex workers that have flocked to the site.” Often, the dangers of online and IRL sex work are simply swept to the side while corporate exploitation is covered up by a girl boss narrative. Read the latest on Lithium now ⚡️
What’s the point of “Fake Accounts”? Written by Lauren Oyler, Fake Accounts is a perfect addition to the list of much-overhyped millennial reading: Normal People, Bad Feminist, How to Do Nothing, etc. And if Oyler wasn’t such a harsh critic of that specific literary circle, this novel would just be another pretty well-written, unmoving book. But Oyler has gone after too many media darlings like Sally Rooney, Jia Tolentino and Roxane Gay in open takedowns that center on her distaste for moralizing, self-absorbed, digital-first writing. Read Lithium writer @katwilliiams take on this book, live on the site now 📚
Britney Spears, Tessica Brown “Gorilla Glue Girl,” and trauma porn all have something in common—they are representations of our fascination with women’s pain. In @tamaravjones’s latest piece for Lithium, she points out that “It’s up to readers to support better journalism and think about the consequences before sharing their unfiltered hot takes on social media. Britney Spears’ legal battle will continue and inevitably, someone else will take Tessica Brown’s spot as the internet’s main character, and I can only hope that we manage to break this cycle before someone else gets hurt.” Live on Lithium now 💫
Playboi Carti’s newest album Whole Lotta Red is the rapper’s ARTPOP. While it’s different from a lot of the rap dominating the Billboard 100, Carti does something a lot of mainstream acts are afraid to do: experiment. Lithium writer @kaiya.shunyata dives deep into Whole Lotta Red and discusses how the album, like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP, is a fantastic work of exploration and departure from the rap that mostly dominated 2020. Read about it now 🎧
When you’re first getting into film, you tend to hear the same names repeated over and over again: Fincher, Scorsese, and, most of all, Tarantino. But when @kaiya.shunyata rewatched his directorial debut Reservoir Dogs, she couldn’t help but think of his mistreatment of actresses (notably, Uma Thurman), his use of the N-word in films, sprinkled in like a garnish he and his fans can’t live without, and decades of controversies. She writes, “It’s become impossible to ignore the way Tarantino has been worshipped, while simultaneously not changing the things for which he’s been criticized.” Read about it on Lithium now 🎬
Middle school sux. Hulu’s Pen15 follows thirteen-year-old best friends Maya and Anna as they tackle an endless seventh-grade year. From day one, they face humiliations that only strike when you are thirteen, like bad haircuts and periods. But Pen15 sets itself apart from all the other middle school dramas by not only having good stories and actors, but drawing attention to the fact that even performing thirteen is a complex thing. Read about it now on Lithium, written by Jade Stillwell 📚
We’re all culprits in contributing to the shame and embarrassment that have become synonymous with listening to specific artists. Rex Orange County has become the unofficial pinnacle of a wannabe-indie girl who’s a regular Urban Outfitters patron. A Smiths fan is egotistical and decidedly unable to get laid. Bon Iver attracts the coffee shop connoisseur with a God complex. @elliergreenberg’s latest is all about why you should reject music elitism— this one is a must-read. Live on Lithium now 🎵
@holt.sheena’s latest piece is an ode to garage bands and punk shows past. She writes, “I loved every part of it—the moshing (which I observed, perplexed, from the sidelines), the music, the sense of belonging.” Read her latest piece on Lithium now 🎸
Shows about getting lost are meaningful in a lot of different ways, especially during the pandemic. Watching shows like Lost and Survivor make us wonder, “how do people skip their skincare routine for more than a week?” to deeper examinations of trust and acts of selflessness when storylines like allies and sacrifice come into play. Alex Eich writes, “These are both stories about our magnificent, if inconvenient, need for other people. And they taught me to find beauty in a shared will to survive.” Read about it now on Lithium 🏝

Input your search keywords and press Enter.