Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Culture & Entertainment

The Big Baby Theory

  • July 8, 2020
  • No comments
  • 5 minute read
  • Isabelle Robinson

This past April, a TikTok of a colossal toddler bouncing on his father’s back was the viral video of the month. The child became an internet sensation when the video started circulating on social media via a popular tweet: “is anyone else just absolutely REPULSED by this giant baby.” Some Twitter users were horrified that someone would write so negatively about the physical appearance of a child, but many more enjoyed the tweet—as of late May, it has been liked or retweeted by over 400,000 people. Since then, the big baby has been the star of several other viral tweets, as well as multiple pieces published by The Cut, Buzzfeed, Daily Mail, and more. The articles all pose the same question: why do so many people feel so averse to this particular baby? Personally, I believe the answer lies in the size of the viewer rather than that of the subject. When I asked a friend who is six feet tall about the video, he said that big baby seemed like “a good guy.” Yeah, well, it’s easy to say that when you know he couldn’t bench-press you. Being just five foot one myself, I’m not totally sold. That kid could take me out with one direct hit.

Unfortunately, there is a darker underside to this admittedly hilarious example. The big baby from TikTok is just another in a litany of sensational children, dating as far back as Jackie Coogan in the 1920s and as recently as Ryan ToysReview today. Despite the many years between them, what all of these children have in common is that they are extremely vulnerable to exploitation, by nature of both their age and their celebrity status. Historically, the mistreatment of famous children has taken a variety of forms, including emotional abuse, financial manipulation, drugging, and sexual violence—and in the virtual age, things have become only more and more complicated. In order to protect the viral children of the present, we must consider their predecessors, the child stars of the Golden Age of Hollywood.

Jackie Coogan and Shirley Temple were two of the earliest and most celebrated child actors; both began performing at three years old, and were featured in dozens of films before the age of 18. Despite retiring from film over 70 years ago, Temple remains a symbol of the wholesome, “all-American” child to this day, and she has the eponymous mocktail to prove it. Her first film credit, aptly titled Baby Burlesks, was a series of shorts in which child actors parodied popular films and other current events. By today’s standards, and even the standards of some initial viewers, the shorts were in unfathomably poor taste: the children were made to perform as prostitutes, lovers, and heavily racialized “savages.” While costumed from the waist up, they wore nothing but safety-pinned diapers below. In Temple’s own account of the production, described in her 1988 memoir Child Star, the films were a “cynical exploitation of our childish innocence.” After years of abuse from critics, producers, and her own husband, actor John Agar Jr., Temple officially announced her retirement from the film industry. She was just 22 years old.

Coogan’s story is equally heinous. His fortune was squandered by his mother and stepfather before he could legally access the money, leaving him virtually penniless. The California Child Actors Bill, frequently referred to as the “Coogan Law,” was enacted in 1939 to protect future child stars from a similar fate. However, no such law exists for the viral children of modernity, who perform on YouTube and Instagram instead of the silver screen. Those who don’t regularly interact with children may be unaware of this, but as all modern moms and babysitters know, kids are absolutely obsessed with a subculture of YouTube known as “unboxing videos.” These are videos of children, usually anywhere from four to ten years old, unboxing and playing with a variety of toys, including slimes and putties, action figures, full playsets, and “mystery eggs.” And these videos aren’t just for fun: they are an extremely lucrative business model. In 2019, the highest-paid YouTuber was eight-year-old Ryan Kaji, or, more accurately, Ryan’s parents Loann and Shion Kaji—in that twelve-month period, the family made $26 million off their YouTube channels alone. While Kaji’s parents have stated that this revenue is being put toward Ryan and his sisters’ futures, there is no law requiring them to do so. 

In light of recent scandals such as influencer Myka Stauffer “rehoming” her adopted autistic toddler, and “family” YouTuber Machelle Hobson being arrested for child abuse, it is not unreasonable to be concerned about the potential physical, emotional, and financial abuse of these so-called “kidfluencers.” This thought is especially chilling when it is considered against the backdrop of pre-Coogan Law Hollywood. Horrifyingly, Shirley Temple and Jackie Coogan’s experiences don’t even scratch the surface of that abuse; despite their traumatic experiences, both turned out to be fairly well-adjusted adults. While this may seem surprising, perhaps it is less so when compared to the extent of what their contemporaries suffered. Both child actors Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney were regularly drugged with an alternating diet of amphetamines and sleeping pills—amphetamines to finish long shoots, and then sleeping pills to take the edge off. Both would struggle with lifelong drug and alcohol addiction as a result, with Garland dying of an accidental overdose at just 47 years old.

Where does the big baby factor into all of this? Well, hopefully nowhere—his fame appears to have been rather short-lived, and his parents have shown no interest in monetizing their son’s viral moment. However, the massive response to the TikTok, which currently has over 15 million views, proves an unfortunate fact of late-stage capitalism: children sell. And some parents, from the traditional overbearing stage mother to the chic, “relatable” Instamom, will do anything for a price. Their children, some of whom have had Instagram profiles since before they were born, are their product—and a legal reckoning just waiting to happen. As both YouTube and Instagram headquarters are based in California, it can be argued that a revised Child Actors Bill—expanded to include children who are virtual content creators—would apply to all minors profiting off these platforms, regardless of the state in which they themselves actually live. The only question is whether this legislation will be updated before or after the next Jackie Coogan—a child you may have already seen on your Explore page—grows up to discover they have been exploited by the very people who are supposed to love them most.

 

By Isabelle Robinson

Related Topics
  • CYBER
  • editor's pick
  • Isabelle Robinson
  • social media
  • Twitter
Previous Article
  • Fashion & Beauty

Exploring the Artistry of 1960s Space Age Fashion 

  • July 7, 2020
  • Jenna Kalishman
View Post
Next Article
  • Life

The Micro-Trends of Quarantine, Ranked

  • July 8, 2020
  • Katherine Williams
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?

  • April 6, 2021
  • Jasmine Li
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Stop Expecting “Sad Indie Girls” to Be Sad All the Time

  • April 2, 2021
  • Natalie Geisel
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Billie Eilish’s Documentary Closes the Gap Between Celebrities and Fans

  • April 1, 2021
  • Ellie Greenberg
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Cosplaying the Working Class: The Ethics of Fictional Poverty in Cinema

  • March 29, 2021
  • Jasmine Li
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Uninspired, Glum, Hopeless? Look No Further Than Modern Love

  • March 26, 2021
  • Sophia Peyser
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Donna Missal’s Quarantine Creation: Introducing “sex is good (but have you tried)”

  • March 25, 2021
  • Julianna Chen
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Finding Catharsis in Painful Cinema

  • March 25, 2021
  • Kaiya Shunyata
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

“Fleabag” and the Beauty in Everyday Pain

  • March 24, 2021
  • Sophia Peyser

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    A Deep Dive Into the Darknet Drug Market
    • April 15, 2021
  • 2
    My Love-Hate Relationship with Email
    • April 14, 2021
  • 3
    Have You Thought About Your Neighbors Today?
    • April 13, 2021
  • 4
    How Capitalism Forces Us to Commodify Our Personal Lives
    • April 12, 2021
  • 5
    Don’t Call Rowing Blazers Founder Jack Carlson Preppy
    • April 9, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Discovering My Sexuality, Alone in My Childhood Bedroom
    • April 8, 2021
  • Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?
    • April 6, 2021
  • What’s Private Is Public: Drawing the Ethical Line as a Personal Essayist 
    • April 5, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (158)
  • Fashion & Beauty (33)
  • Life (149)
  • News & Politics (74)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (70)
Search
Instagram
Capitalism forces us to commodify our personal lives. Success is measured by profitability—and how well we can package our personal lives to gain likeability and engagement. And with that can come mistreatment, unethical acts that are difficult to fight against alone. Lithium writer @jordinna notes, “It is the role of the privileged to take a stand and bargain whenever necessary to pave the way for those unable to do so themselves. If you can safely express your opposition, complaints, or needs, you should, as you’ll be encouraging the development of a healthier and more ethical setting for those with precarious jobs.” Read about it now on Lithium ⚖️
In an interview with @jackcarlson, the founder of @rowingblazers, there are several tangents and an unabashed bluntness about the state of contemporary fashion and consumption. He doesn’t hesitate to name-drop when talking about everything he never wants Rowing Blazers to become—Rowing Blazers wants to turn stuffiness into self-awareness within the world of preppy style. Read our latest interview by @katwilliiams on Lithium ⚡️
From scrolling through Tumblr to inviting significant others in, @mayarpage’s bedroom was an inseparable part of discovering her sexuality. In her newest personal essay, she writes, “My old bedroom is a time capsule—it invokes the memories of my coming of age, the euphoric feelings of finding myself, feeling seen and loved. The door will always be open.” Read on Lithium now ⏳
Nowadays, good taste is a currency for clout. The rise of curation in all echelons of the cultural hierarchy results from the problem at the heart of digital consumerism: people don’t trust algorithms and are overwhelmed by choice. Curation, therefore, is the counterculture movement that restores meaning to content and products. But, with that comes concerns of gatekeeping and elitism and consumerism. Read @jvsli’s latest on Lithium now ⚡️
For personal essayists, what’s private often feels public. Are writers more preoccupied with protecting other people’s information than their own? Lithium writer @itsalicegarnett muses, No writer ever wants to receive the ‘is this about me?’ text, so we omit and we fine-tune to avoid conflict with the people in our lives. Still, thanks to writing so many personal essays, I’m struggling to draw the line between myself as Person versus myself as Writer.” Read more on the site now ✍️
Really, the new Billie Eilish documentary helps bridge the gap between the celebrity and her fans. @elliergreenberg writes, “With one foot in what’s left of her childhood—hanging with hometown friends, sleeping in her childhood bedroom, and spending time with her protective parents—Eilish is also beginning to step into adulthood, the process being considerably sped up by her burgeoning fame. This constant push and pull between her two worlds is ever-so-present throughout the film, speaking truth to the title—the world is spinning around Eilish, dizzying her in the process.” Read about it now on Lithium ⛓
The music industry slaps this label—“sad girl indie”—on any woman who expresses her emotions. It’s lazy at best but precarious at worst, revealing both the issues with the label and the need to invent more appropriate genres (or ditch categorization altogether). In her latest essay, @nat.geisel writes about the dilemma of the “sad indie girl” trope faced by artists from Phoebe Bridgers to Mitski, while men who share their emotions are applauded for their brilliance. Read more on the site now 🎶
Normalize disliking people for no particular reason. Let’s face it—we just don’t click with everyone we meet. And there doesn’t have to be beef. Don’t lead people on—you can make it clear there’s no friendship (whether it’s because you have nothing in common, you don’t vibe with them, or they just annoy you). After all, there’s a glow-up that comes with just not caring. Read @chelsiearia’s latest essay on the site now💫
A little party never killed anybody, right? In this hauntingly personal essay, Lauren Andrikanich reflects upon her party experiences from childhood to now, in the midst of a pandemic and a sense of losing herself. She writes, “The best time for parties is when you’re young, before you know that all the adults hate each other. Parties just don’t have the same feel to them after you’ve heard your mom’s best friend scream at your dad in the driveway of a costume party.” Read about it now on Lithium 🖤

Input your search keywords and press Enter.