Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Life

Are Blue-Light Glasses the Opioid of the Digital World?

  • July 14, 2020
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • Anna M Erickson

America has a complicated relationship with prescription drugs—especially thanks to the overprescription of opioids like OxyContin and Vicodin. This relationship falls under constant scrutiny for many reasons, two most universally being 1. the addictive element of these drugs and 2. the fact that opioids are legitimately used to treat pain. Symptom control. 

Intense symptom control is necessary at times and very effective, when adhering to the proper protocol and paired with supplementary treatment. But when standing alone, symptom control is a slippery slope. The suppression of a problem becomes counterproductive when the actual issue isn’t properly addressed. 

Enter: blue-light glasses. Their selling point is their promise to most likely protect you from harmful blue light rays that often come with the overuse of screen-based technology. With this in mind, consumers often purchase blue-light glasses to “protect their eyes” while spending workdays in front of a screen—claiming them to be a remedy for dry eyes, strained eyes, headaches, and more. 

But the interesting thing about blue-light glasses is that they allow us to continue using technology even with these symptoms—instead of, say, cutting down screen time. BB (blue-blocking) has become a buzzword; it’s like we decided that blue light was bad, and made a product to remedy this. This begs the question: do we buy these glasses as a sort of Band-Aid for the greater problem, or are they actually useful? 

From Jennifer Aniston to Miley Cyrus, plenty of A-list stars have been donning blue-light glasses and upping their hype. They’ve become so trendy that New York Magazine even posted an update in their article “Do Blue-Light-Blocking Glasses Actually Do Anything?” which reads: 

“Update: A few of you have written to ask whether there were more stylish options than the Uvex blue-light glasses we recommended when we first published this post in April. We’ve refreshed this story with a few more aesthetically pleasing options.” 

So really, where are people’s true ideals in all of this? 

I’m not going to lie—I caved in to this trend and bought a pair myself. After browsing the internet I landed on Quay Australia’s Blue-Light Glasses, which made it easy to find a fashion-forward pair because of their “Virtual Try-On” feature. 

What I discovered was that whenever I got a headache due to too much screen time, I would pop on my blue-light glasses and be able to keep working. Did it help? Kind of. Getting headaches was no longer an issue, and I could look cute while working. I’d also say that wearing the glasses made me feel like I was part of some elite protect-your-eyes community, and purchasing them made me feel like I was taking care of my eyes, mind, and body. 

But still, I wonder—with these self-fulfilling purchases, are the companies selling these glasses like Felix Gray and Gunnar just exploiting an internet-wired society? Like, do they actually work? That seems to be the question everyone’s asking, from The Washington Post to medical clinics. Since the FDA doesn’t regulate eyewear, there’s little medical initiative to look into the matter. Instead, there are testimonials, speculations, educated guesses, and a ton of endless advertisements. At this point, the best option is to explore the most popular arguments and myths surrounding the trend. 

First off, it’s helpful to know that blue light is everywhere. Blue light isn’t a new facet of the digital world; it’s been around forever, considering most of the blue light we receive is from the sun. What is new is the marketing of blue light. Blue light rays have become the “reason” for eye strain in the media—which isn’t entirely true. In fact, the advertising of blue-light glasses has arguably gone too far.

In 2017 a UK company called Boots Opticians was fined 40,000 euros over misleading blue-light advertising. The company got into financial trouble when they claimed that their eyewear could protect users from retinal damage caused by blue light—in reality, there isn’t scientific data that confirms that statement. 

It’s also important to note that eye strain and the effect of blue light are two separate issues. Eye strain from laptops, tablets, and phones generally falls under the category of computer vision syndrome (CVS). CVS, also known as digital eye strain, shows up in symptoms including eye strain, headaches, blurred vision, dry eyes, neck and shoulder pain. 

What’s interesting about these symptoms is that people report similar feelings after reading a book for too long. It’s the process of staring that causes many issues here—not blue light specifically. So despite what the ads may say, your headache likely isn’t from blue light, but staring at the same thing for too long. 

Blue light is actually infamous for disrupting sleep patterns, specifically your circadian rhythm or “internal clock.” Because our bodies associate blue light with daytime, staring at a screen before bed can trick your body into thinking it needs to be alert.

As an owner of the glasses myself, I know they’re cute, on trend, and feel health-conscious. And there’s nothing wrong with indulging in a new pair of glasses, joining the A-list stars, or testing it out for yourself. But whether or not you make the purchase, ask yourself—could it be that blue-light glasses are just enabling us to use technology more and not feel bad about it?

 

By Anna M Erickson

Related Topics
  • Anna M Erickson
  • CYBER
  • health
  • technology
Previous Article
  • Photography

Interdimensions

  • July 14, 2020
  • Ashley Zhang
View Post
Next Article
  • Culture & Entertainment

Blame It on the Score: Things I Have Done Because of Movie Music

  • July 15, 2020
  • Saffron Maeve
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Life

My Love-Hate Relationship with Email

  • April 14, 2021
  • Jordinna Joaquin
View Post
  • Life

Have You Thought About Your Neighbors Today?

  • April 13, 2021
  • Gabriella Ferrigine
View Post
  • Life

How Capitalism Forces Us to Commodify Our Personal Lives

  • April 12, 2021
  • Jordinna Joaquin
View Post
  • Life

Discovering My Sexuality, Alone in My Childhood Bedroom

  • April 8, 2021
  • Maya Page
View Post
  • Life

What’s Private Is Public: Drawing the Ethical Line as a Personal Essayist 

  • April 5, 2021
  • Alice Garnett
View Post
  • Life

Normalize Disliking People for No Particular Reason

  • March 31, 2021
  • Chelsie DeSouza
View Post
  • Life

A Little Party Never Killed Nobody—Just My Sense of Self

  • March 30, 2021
  • Lauren Andrikanich
View Post
  • Life

Empathy Isn’t Toxic: The Problem With Emotional Labor Discourse

  • March 26, 2021
  • Cierra Bettens

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    My Love-Hate Relationship with Email
    • April 14, 2021
  • 2
    Have You Thought About Your Neighbors Today?
    • April 13, 2021
  • 3
    How Capitalism Forces Us to Commodify Our Personal Lives
    • April 12, 2021
  • 4
    Don’t Call Rowing Blazers Founder Jack Carlson Preppy
    • April 9, 2021
  • 5
    Discovering My Sexuality, Alone in My Childhood Bedroom
    • April 8, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?
    • April 6, 2021
  • What’s Private Is Public: Drawing the Ethical Line as a Personal Essayist 
    • April 5, 2021
  • Stop Expecting “Sad Indie Girls” to Be Sad All the Time
    • April 2, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (158)
  • Fashion & Beauty (33)
  • Life (148)
  • News & Politics (74)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (70)
Search
Instagram
Capitalism forces us to commodify our personal lives. Success is measured by profitability—and how well we can package our personal lives to gain likeability and engagement. And with that can come mistreatment, unethical acts that are difficult to fight against alone. Lithium writer @jordinna notes, “It is the role of the privileged to take a stand and bargain whenever necessary to pave the way for those unable to do so themselves. If you can safely express your opposition, complaints, or needs, you should, as you’ll be encouraging the development of a healthier and more ethical setting for those with precarious jobs.” Read about it now on Lithium ⚖️
In an interview with @jackcarlson, the founder of @rowingblazers, there are several tangents and an unabashed bluntness about the state of contemporary fashion and consumption. He doesn’t hesitate to name-drop when talking about everything he never wants Rowing Blazers to become—Rowing Blazers wants to turn stuffiness into self-awareness within the world of preppy style. Read our latest interview by @katwilliiams on Lithium ⚡️
From scrolling through Tumblr to inviting significant others in, @mayarpage’s bedroom was an inseparable part of discovering her sexuality. In her newest personal essay, she writes, “My old bedroom is a time capsule—it invokes the memories of my coming of age, the euphoric feelings of finding myself, feeling seen and loved. The door will always be open.” Read on Lithium now ⏳
Nowadays, good taste is a currency for clout. The rise of curation in all echelons of the cultural hierarchy results from the problem at the heart of digital consumerism: people don’t trust algorithms and are overwhelmed by choice. Curation, therefore, is the counterculture movement that restores meaning to content and products. But, with that comes concerns of gatekeeping and elitism and consumerism. Read @jvsli’s latest on Lithium now ⚡️
For personal essayists, what’s private often feels public. Are writers more preoccupied with protecting other people’s information than their own? Lithium writer @itsalicegarnett muses, No writer ever wants to receive the ‘is this about me?’ text, so we omit and we fine-tune to avoid conflict with the people in our lives. Still, thanks to writing so many personal essays, I’m struggling to draw the line between myself as Person versus myself as Writer.” Read more on the site now ✍️
Really, the new Billie Eilish documentary helps bridge the gap between the celebrity and her fans. @elliergreenberg writes, “With one foot in what’s left of her childhood—hanging with hometown friends, sleeping in her childhood bedroom, and spending time with her protective parents—Eilish is also beginning to step into adulthood, the process being considerably sped up by her burgeoning fame. This constant push and pull between her two worlds is ever-so-present throughout the film, speaking truth to the title—the world is spinning around Eilish, dizzying her in the process.” Read about it now on Lithium ⛓
The music industry slaps this label—“sad girl indie”—on any woman who expresses her emotions. It’s lazy at best but precarious at worst, revealing both the issues with the label and the need to invent more appropriate genres (or ditch categorization altogether). In her latest essay, @nat.geisel writes about the dilemma of the “sad indie girl” trope faced by artists from Phoebe Bridgers to Mitski, while men who share their emotions are applauded for their brilliance. Read more on the site now 🎶
Normalize disliking people for no particular reason. Let’s face it—we just don’t click with everyone we meet. And there doesn’t have to be beef. Don’t lead people on—you can make it clear there’s no friendship (whether it’s because you have nothing in common, you don’t vibe with them, or they just annoy you). After all, there’s a glow-up that comes with just not caring. Read @chelsiearia’s latest essay on the site now💫
A little party never killed anybody, right? In this hauntingly personal essay, Lauren Andrikanich reflects upon her party experiences from childhood to now, in the midst of a pandemic and a sense of losing herself. She writes, “The best time for parties is when you’re young, before you know that all the adults hate each other. Parties just don’t have the same feel to them after you’ve heard your mom’s best friend scream at your dad in the driveway of a costume party.” Read about it now on Lithium 🖤

Input your search keywords and press Enter.