Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Culture & Entertainment

Shane Dawson and the Myth of the Unproblematic YouTuber 

  • July 18, 2020
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • Kiddest Sinke

I used to wish I was Shane Dawson.

Well, not really. But there was a time when I craved his spotlight.

It was back in 2008, when I was ten years old. YouTube had just gone mainstream, and every day after school, I would rush downstairs and plop myself down in front of our clunky desktop computer; I’d binge videos of popular creators like Jenna Marbles, Niga Higa, Andrea Russett, FRED, and of course, Shane Dawson. 

It wasn’t so much that I admired his content. Embarrassingly, most of his skits went over my head. It was more that I admired that he was creating content at all. I admired that millions of people were consuming his content, and I thought that maybe one day millions of people would consume my content, too. 

A fifth grader at the time, I never realized that the reason Shane Dawson was succeeding on YouTube was the exact reason I wouldn’t. He was a 20-year-old white man. I was a 10-year-old biracial girl. He made racist videos caricurating Black people and other minorities. I did not.

In fact, Shane Dawson had built an empire mocking people like me. And it worked because he had a predominately white, loyal audience that cheered him on, all under the guise of “dark humor.” This was the same audience that would harass me at school for the color of my skin and say it was just a joke when I called them out. 

But that didn’t stop me from watching Shane. He was on the front page of YouTube; to me, he represented a level of fame I could only dream about. 

In retrospect, I suppose this was a form of idolization. Like many other children my age, I’d fallen into the trap of believing in the unproblematic YouTuber. 

Much like the K-pop idol or the Disney star, the unproblematic YouTuber is a construct of our own imagination. An impossibly perfect person, this YouTuber is placed on a digital pedestal and celebrated as someone who can do no wrong. Both role model and relatable friend, the unproblematic YouTuber feels more accessible than the traditional celebrity—a relationship that only reinforces the unproblematic myth, because who wants to believe that their friend is a bad guy? 

In the case of Shane Dawson, this myth granted him the title “King of YouTube,” despite his previously very public persona of blackface, pedophilic jokes, and fat-shaming, among other issues that were swept under the rug when he transitioned to more palatable but nonetheless shocking content: conspiracy videos, documentary series, autobiographies, mental-health talks, makeup tutorials, and so on. Dawson was never truly held accountable for his actions until a few weeks ago, when he was “canceled.” 

When fans’ illusions are shattered, a paradigm shift occurs in which the majority of fans suddenly awaken to the harsh reality: their YouTube idol was never really unproblematic in the first place; they just fooled themself into thinking so. Disgusted not only with their idol but with themselves, they scramble to hold the YouTuber accountable, thinking this absolves them of culpability.

In this sense, cancel culture is a symptom of a society that fails to hold people responsible in the moment. To “cancel” someone is often to retroactively hold someone accountable for something they should’ve been called out for in the past. 

The unproblematic YouTuber thrives in a retroactive environment. Retroactivity allows the YouTuber to soak up the spotlight for controversial behavior; only later, when they have the buffer of fame and fortune, will they suffer the consequences. 

These consequences are usually a public apology, a temporary dip in followers and finances, and if we’re lucky, a slight tweak in behavior. After that, they just have to wait it out until someone else gets canceled and everyone forgets about their scandal. This is why YouTubers like Logan Paul, Pewdiepie, James Charles, Jeffrey Star, Tana Mongeau, Trisha Paytas, and Shane Dawson are able to bounce back after being canceled.

Logan Paul still has 22 million subscribers after posting a video of Japan’s suicide forest; he uploads multiple videos a week, almost all of them garnering over 5 million views. Pewdiepie, who’s been canceled multiple times for using the N-word and anti-Semitic slurs, still has the second-highest subscriber count of any YouTuber. 

How legitimate is a cancelation if someone can bounce back within a matter of days, weeks, or months? Is this cycle a form of forgiveness, or is it just hypocrisy? In other words, are we becoming more merciful or more forgetful? 

While I’m usually pretty skeptical, I definitely believe there should be room for forgiveness, even after being canceled. I worry, though, that the cyclical nature of being canceled may stop people from ever being truly accountable.

As a corporation, YouTube has a vested interest in this quick turn-over cycle. It means they can profit off unproblematic creators when the public likes them, and when the tides turn, they can demonetize these same YouTubers and still come away as the “good guy.” 

It’s unacceptable that it took YouTube ten years to demonetize Shane Dawson’s content—just like it’s unacceptable that it took ten years for users to recognize he should be canceled.

As consumers we need to be more cognizant of a YouTuber’s problematic behavior not retroactively, but proactively. We need to call out creators in the moment rather than years later, sparking conversations as soon as possible. And when that conversation isn’t possible—when we’ve waited so long that we have no choice but to cancel them—we need to recognize not just the YouTuber’s unacceptable behavior, but our complicity in it. We need to recognize our behavior, and we need to change. We need to hold other people accountable, but also ourselves. 

 

By Kiddest Sinke

Related Topics
  • cancel culture
  • CYBER
  • Kiddest Sinke
  • racism
  • social media
  • YouTube
Previous Article
  • News & Politics

The Myth of Meritocracy in Education

  • July 18, 2020
  • Esme Lee
View Post
Next Article
  • Photography

Blurred

  • July 19, 2020
  • Callie Keels
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?

  • March 1, 2021
  • Katherine Williams
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain

  • February 28, 2021
  • Tamara Jones
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

“Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020

  • February 28, 2021
  • Kaiya Shunyata
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino

  • February 27, 2021
  • Kaiya Shunyata
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Why You Should Reject Music Elitism

  • February 26, 2021
  • Ellie Greenberg
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Middle School Ends, But “Pen15” Is Forever 

  • February 26, 2021
  • Jadie Stillwell
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

How TV About Getting Lost Taught Me About Survival

  • February 25, 2021
  • Alex Eichenstein
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

An Ode to Garage Bands and Punk Shows Past

  • February 25, 2021
  • Sheena Holt

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    We’re Not Really Strangers Makes Me Feel Held
    • March 5, 2021
  • 2
    How the Left Is Becoming Reactionary
    • March 4, 2021
  • 3
    Sexual Empowerment or Reckless Endangerment?
    • March 2, 2021
  • 4
    What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?
    • March 1, 2021
  • 5
    Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain
    • February 28, 2021
Recent Posts
  • “Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020
    • February 28, 2021
  • Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino
    • February 27, 2021
  • Why You Should Reject Music Elitism
    • February 26, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (141)
  • Fashion & Beauty (31)
  • Life (134)
  • News & Politics (70)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (68)
Search
Instagram
@nat.geisel discovered @werenotreallystrangers one month into quarantine, virtually getting to know while concurrently falling in love with her girlfriend at the time, by playing their free, downloadable quarantine edition with her over FaceTime. We’re Not Really Strangers reminds us that even through sadness, anxiety, and emotions we can’t exactly name, we are all trying our best. Check out the latest on Lithium now ♥️
The left is becoming reactionary. Blame it on the proliferation of liberalism or whatever, but you can’t deny that a lot of leftists today constantly moralize, seeing personal flaws as akin to structural ones. Instead of politics of reaction, we should be practicing politics of actions. As @kosherwhitewine writes, “Instead of treating leftism like an inclusive club, we must treat it as it’s meant to be—as a collective banner under which we march toward the liberation of all people. We don’t break each other down; we build each other up, standing together, fighting together.” Read about it on Lithium now 🗣
OnlyFans, selling worn underwear, sex work—are these acts of sexual empowerment or reckless endangerment? As Modesty Sanchez writes, “Because OnlyFans creators are portrayed as entrepreneurs taking control of their image and brand, the role that the platform itself plays is often obscured and dismissed, especially since the company prefers to hide behind the feminist, sex-positive glow emanating from the sex workers that have flocked to the site.” Often, the dangers of online and IRL sex work are simply swept to the side while corporate exploitation is covered up by a girl boss narrative. Read the latest on Lithium now ⚡️
What’s the point of “Fake Accounts”? Written by Lauren Oyler, Fake Accounts is a perfect addition to the list of much-overhyped millennial reading: Normal People, Bad Feminist, How to Do Nothing, etc. And if Oyler wasn’t such a harsh critic of that specific literary circle, this novel would just be another pretty well-written, unmoving book. But Oyler has gone after too many media darlings like Sally Rooney, Jia Tolentino and Roxane Gay in open takedowns that center on her distaste for moralizing, self-absorbed, digital-first writing. Read Lithium writer @katwilliiams take on this book, live on the site now 📚
Britney Spears, Tessica Brown “Gorilla Glue Girl,” and trauma porn all have something in common—they are representations of our fascination with women’s pain. In @tamaravjones’s latest piece for Lithium, she points out that “It’s up to readers to support better journalism and think about the consequences before sharing their unfiltered hot takes on social media. Britney Spears’ legal battle will continue and inevitably, someone else will take Tessica Brown’s spot as the internet’s main character, and I can only hope that we manage to break this cycle before someone else gets hurt.” Live on Lithium now 💫
Playboi Carti’s newest album Whole Lotta Red is the rapper’s ARTPOP. While it’s different from a lot of the rap dominating the Billboard 100, Carti does something a lot of mainstream acts are afraid to do: experiment. Lithium writer @kaiya.shunyata dives deep into Whole Lotta Red and discusses how the album, like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP, is a fantastic work of exploration and departure from the rap that mostly dominated 2020. Read about it now 🎧
When you’re first getting into film, you tend to hear the same names repeated over and over again: Fincher, Scorsese, and, most of all, Tarantino. But when @kaiya.shunyata rewatched his directorial debut Reservoir Dogs, she couldn’t help but think of his mistreatment of actresses (notably, Uma Thurman), his use of the N-word in films, sprinkled in like a garnish he and his fans can’t live without, and decades of controversies. She writes, “It’s become impossible to ignore the way Tarantino has been worshipped, while simultaneously not changing the things for which he’s been criticized.” Read about it on Lithium now 🎬
Middle school sux. Hulu’s Pen15 follows thirteen-year-old best friends Maya and Anna as they tackle an endless seventh-grade year. From day one, they face humiliations that only strike when you are thirteen, like bad haircuts and periods. But Pen15 sets itself apart from all the other middle school dramas by not only having good stories and actors, but drawing attention to the fact that even performing thirteen is a complex thing. Read about it now on Lithium, written by Jade Stillwell 📚
We’re all culprits in contributing to the shame and embarrassment that have become synonymous with listening to specific artists. Rex Orange County has become the unofficial pinnacle of a wannabe-indie girl who’s a regular Urban Outfitters patron. A Smiths fan is egotistical and decidedly unable to get laid. Bon Iver attracts the coffee shop connoisseur with a God complex. @elliergreenberg’s latest is all about why you should reject music elitism— this one is a must-read. Live on Lithium now 🎵

Input your search keywords and press Enter.