Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • Activism, News, & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • Activism, News, & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Fashion & Beauty

Startups, Starter Packs, and the Limits of Instagram Fashion

  • July 31, 2020
  • No comments
  • 5 minute read
  • Katherine Williams

Though the starter pack meme has mostly faded from trendiness, we all recognize its basic structure. Whether you’re a VSCO girl or an indie e-boy, you can definitely find one of these posts made specifically to call you out. A starter pack for the former will likely showcase a Hydroflask, Mario Badescu facial mist, and assorted Glossier products; for the latter, a Stussy sweatshirt and a Juul. 

These starter packs embody the sort of universal teen experience that comes with social media and the internet. We like the same memes and follow the same influencers. We shop on the same websites and scroll through the same Instagram ads targeted at us based on gender, race, and age. So when someone says “Hydroflask,” we immediately understand the connotations of the word, the assumptions we make based on ownership of the brand’s water bottles.

Starter packs, on a micro-level of Gen-Z internet culture, indicate just how much our consumer choices define us. Suddenly, our water bottle is no longer a mindless, practical purchase for hydration, but a small social signal about who we are as a person. Suddenly, we are what we buy.

Consumption as a status symbol is not a new concept, especially in fashion. Traditionally, luxury fabrics, designer labels, and avant garde statement pieces have been indicators of status and wealth. The things we own, on their most basic level, are an outward expression of both personal and group identity, and the purpose of fashion in particular has always been to communicate. But social media has warped the idea of consumption into a jumbled mess of Instagram branding, rapidly changing aesthetic preferences, and Gen Z’s growing devotion to brands who claim to be ethical, sustainable, and feminist. 

Because we shop almost exclusively on the internet, social media branding is necessary in order to connect with a younger consumer audience. Endless accounts fill my Instagram feed with recycled cotton sweatshirts in muted jewel tones and handmade beaded bags on the virtual arm of every Soho influencer. It seems like for every kind of clothing item, there are about three startups run by women in their 20s with a “commitment to sustainability,” including but not limited to Outdoor Voices, Thinx, Parade, Golde, Glossier, Mejuri, Girlfriend Collective… You get the gist. 

Consider, say, a starter pack for a hip, chic, eco-friendly millennial: Reformation jeans, recycled cotton Buffy sheets, Veja sneakers. We understand the idea of this woman. Perhaps we even know her in real life. Her commitment to the environment is not through conscious minimalism but performative consumption, her closet and apartment filled with things that signal morality to an audience. 

The branding of trendy companies is simultaneously subtle enough to draw you in and obvious enough to tell you exactly what lifestyle you should have. The cultural symbolism of wearing Outdoor Voices is not as explicit as class or wealth, as fashion traditionally indicates. It is a signal of one’s lifestyle, an assumption of an entire personality distilled down into the purchases of an Instagram-savvy millennial woman.

The appeal of these companies is not necessarily the true quality or appearance of their products, but the feeling that you are living the lifestyle of this brand. I admit, I own the exercise dress from Outdoor Voices, and wearing it gives me a rush of self-satisfactory pleasure in feeling that I really could be (am?) a 20-something woman whose days consist of walking my dog, perusing the farmers’ market, and working in something vaguely related to fashion or media. Wearing the dress makes me feel cool, to put it simply.

Maybe the intent of lifestyle branding is genuinely to shift consumption toward socially responsible brands. But the social media emphasis of those brands makes it difficult to see the benefits of “ethical,” trendy consumerism. Am I buying this Reformation dress because I genuinely want it, or because I think it will look good on Instagram and cultivate a better personal brand? Do I like it, or am I just obsessed with this possible version of myself? Am I eco-friendly or just vain? Brands built on ethical promises, diverse models, editorial lighting, and user-generated content often blur those lines, and I can’t help but feel that vanity is the primary motive. 

In her New Yorker article on athleisure, Jia Tolentino comments that the classic recreation kits from Outdoor Voices “make the wearer look as if she were put on earth to be viewed on Instagram.” In some ways, I want to believe that a company really can be playful and aesthetic and responsible—nothing more, nothing less. But the shallowness of fashion ethics on Instagram is so depressing that I can’t honestly convince myself of optimism. A kale-turmeric face mask and sustainably sourced pearl hoops might be “better” for the world than a sheet mask and silver studs from Claire’s, but using Instagram as an endless display of on-trend ethical consumption is simply narcissistic.

Starter packs are a cultural microcosm of our growing and increasingly nuanced devotion to brands. Teenage style is no longer as simple as having the latest Nikes or Hollister jeans. What you buy and what you wear is no longer a binary measure of “cool” or “uncool.” Now, our purchases place us into one of the internet’s approved niches, our humanity defined by a set of material items. In a way, starter packs function as a one-stop shop for purchasing a personality. 

We worship self-indulgence and consumption. But owning things will never satisfy our desire for meaning. Wearing jeans produced by women who earn a living wage may nudge the needle of capitalism toward better practices, but consumption itself will never change the world. 

Sustainable fashion is a positive trend within the industry, no doubt, but it is still a status symbol. Perhaps it is a more moral status symbol than, say, a fur coat, but the perpetuation of inequality and vanity is nonetheless intertwined in its significance. Just because fashion now exists for social media and answers the calls of a more socially conscious generation, doesn’t mean that it is simply better, nor is it exempt from critique. Cute Instagram brands may seem like the utopian future of sustainable fashion, but they’re ultimately just an outlet for people who are uncomfortable with the guilt of materialism.

In a virtual world where algorithms are God and profit is everything, the fashion industry must cater not only to the demands of “women in their 20s” but to specific personality niches like “New York women in their 20s who want to look hot for cocktail hour and for the Climate March.” Now more than ever, your purchases are used to calculate the contours of your identity. And even if you think ethical brands are, in a way, subversive, your “morally superior” purchases are just a self-congratulatory virtue signal to your followers. Instagram has turned fashion into a status symbol of the virtual world. After all, if you didn’t post a picture in your Outdoor Voices, did you even wear it? 

 

By Katherine Williams

Related Topics
  • CYBER
  • editor's pick
  • fashion
  • Instagram
  • Jia Tolentino
  • Katherine Williams
  • social media
Previous Article
  • Life

Society Has Progressed Past the Need for Indie Men

  • July 30, 2020
  • Andrea Panaligan
View Post
Next Article
  • Activism, News, & Politics

Recovering from Cyber Justice Burnout

  • July 31, 2020
  • Tyler Bey
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

Thank You, Instagram, for Ruining My Face

  • February 23, 2021
  • Chloe Rose
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

Faith, Freud, and Fetish: The Impact of Galliano’s Fall 2000 Collection

  • February 17, 2021
  • Aarohi Sheth
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

Fiorucci’s Revival: 16th-Century Art Meets Depop

  • January 29, 2021
  • Irine Le
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

25 Years Later, “Clueless” Fashion Is Still, Like, Totally Important

  • January 26, 2021
  • Bec Oakes
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

An Intimate Look at Intimate Apparel

  • January 21, 2021
  • Cierra Bettens
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

Makeup in Conversation with Frostie Delite

  • December 5, 2020
  • Aashna Agarwal
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

The Body-Positive Movement Will Not Be Advertised

  • December 1, 2020
  • Modesty Sanchez
View Post
  • Fashion & Beauty

The Y2K Renaissance: Fashion As Pleasure

  • November 9, 2020
  • Kiddest Sinke

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino
    • February 27, 2021
  • 2
    Why You Should Reject Music Elitism
    • February 26, 2021
  • 3
    Middle School Ends, But “Pen15” Is Forever 
    • February 26, 2021
  • 4
    How TV About Getting Lost Taught Me About Survival
    • February 25, 2021
  • 5
    An Ode to Garage Bands and Punk Shows Past
    • February 25, 2021
Recent Posts
  • r/WallStreetBets Was Never David
    • February 24, 2021
  • Foucault, Data, and Human Intimacy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism
    • February 24, 2021
  • Thank You, Instagram, for Ruining My Face
    • February 23, 2021
Categories
  • Activism, News, & Politics (69)
  • Culture & Entertainment (138)
  • Fashion & Beauty (31)
  • Life (134)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (67)
Search
Instagram
Middle school sux. Hulu’s Pen15 follows thirteen-year-old best friends Maya and Anna as they tackle an endless seventh-grade year. From day one, they face humiliations that only strike when you are thirteen, like bad haircuts and periods. But Pen15 sets itself apart from all the other middle school dramas by not only having good stories and actors, but drawing attention to the fact that even performing thirteen is a complex thing. Read about it now on Lithium, written by Jade Stillwell 📚
We’re all culprits in contributing to the shame and embarrassment that have become synonymous with listening to specific artists. Rex Orange County has become the unofficial pinnacle of a wannabe-indie girl who’s a regular Urban Outfitters patron. A Smiths fan is egotistical and decidedly unable to get laid. Bon Iver attracts the coffee shop connoisseur with a God complex. @elliergreenberg’s latest is all about why you should reject music elitism— this one is a must-read. Live on Lithium now 🎵
@holt.sheena’s latest piece is an ode to garage bands and punk shows past. She writes, “I loved every part of it—the moshing (which I observed, perplexed, from the sidelines), the music, the sense of belonging.” Read her latest piece on Lithium now 🎸
Shows about getting lost are meaningful in a lot of different ways, especially during the pandemic. Watching shows like Lost and Survivor make us wonder, “how do people skip their skincare routine for more than a week?” to deeper examinations of trust and acts of selflessness when storylines like allies and sacrifice come into play. Alex Eich writes, “These are both stories about our magnificent, if inconvenient, need for other people. And they taught me to find beauty in a shared will to survive.” Read about it now on Lithium 🏝
Like most of us, @cierrabetts doesn’t read the terms and conditions, giving in and pressing buttons that half-heartedly beg for her permission to collect data. And in the dating world, many of us uncover deeper remnants of a romantic interest’s digital footprint; the blatantly misogynistic tweet they made in 2013 differs from the progressive, feminist persona they wear now. So... how does this affect our ability to be vulnerable with one another, then? How do we disclose our real selves when the first impression someone has is often of our hyperreal, online selves? Read the latest on Lithium now 📱
Remember GameStop a few weeks ago? Yeah. r/WallStreetBets was never David. For a while media compared this reddit group comprised of mostly video-gaming young men to David, a heroic figure that took down the giant Goliath that is Wall Street. As Lithium writer @jillrisberg_ puts it, “Regardless of the individual members’ knowledge and experience, by collectively following and repeating trending commands, the group operates, wins, and fails as a herd. When we take into account the group’s simple, commanding language and their massive amount of brand-new, bandwagoning members, it feels fair to suggest the group was not collectively informed enough to successfully take down the hedge funds they were up against.” Read about it now 💸
Everyone wants to have what Jia Tolentino coined Instagram face. Filters that turn normal noses into upturned, perfect ski slopes, filters with Angelina Jolie-esque cheekbones, filters that give the illusion of plastic surgery without having to spend $10,000 on that nose job. But after you remove the filter, the fantasy is over and you’re left with a nose that looks ten times bigger than before. Lithium writer @chloerose8 explores beauty standards and our digital lives in her newest essay—read about it now 📱
Our generation seems to have learned the skill of moving seamlessly from processing the latest societal trauma to something like fantasy role-play a little too well. And sometimes, it feels like a sin. @lonelycorvid writes “There’s no way to properly grieve all the people and possibilities we’ve lost in the last year. We have to pick our battles, and if I’m being honest I spend more of my time worrying I’ve picked the wrong ones than actually fighting them.” Read his latest piece on Lithium now ⚡️
TikTok is offering a community for ex-Mormons everywhere. For her newest Lithium piece, staff writer @loganwcross spoke with multiple ex-Mormon TikTokers about why they make videos and why they left the Church. She writes, “Satirizing the former Mormon experience is common for many of these creators. It acts as both a coping mechanism for the creator and an educational tool for their viewers. Whether that means joking about what it’s like drinking coffee in front of their still-Mormon parents or speaking out about the trauma that comes with growing up in a purity-obsessed culture, these creators risk putting their relationships with their families and communities on the line whenever they hit ‘post.’” This one’s a must-read—live on the site now 💒

Input your search keywords and press Enter.