Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • News & Politics

Staying Vigilant in Twitter’s News Sphere

  • August 21, 2020
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • Jordinna Joaquin

I’ve learned almost everything I know about politics from Twitter. When my nation’s government released the controversial drafted revision of criminal law in mid-2019, I flocked to Twitter—as many other Indonesians did—to join the mass outrage that took place within threads upon threads, replies, and retweets. Instead of opening the official People’s Representative Council website to search for that revised document, I used Twitter’s search bar. 

Last year in January, an interaction between a teenager and a Native American activist during two different political demonstrations occurring near the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. gained virality and triggered anger among Twitter users. As more videos emerged over the next few days, it became evident that the reporting of the incident had misinterpreted and failed to include some critical details about the situation. The high school students involved were painted as aggressors by the media. They received death threats, leading to the school’s temporary closure for safety measures and fear of impending violence. 

After the first video was contextualized with previously omitted details regarding what had happened in the minutes before and after the incident, many in the media confessed they should have waited longer for more information. The thing about Twitter is that the kind of virality that ensues on the app enforces FOMO, a narrow outlook at what’s happening, and more emotional provocation than critical thinking and empathy. It’s understandable to an extent; we’re passionate, and we believe in social justice. But when our fiery reactions to incomplete stories—or even just viral tweets—ignite public outcry that shapes a significant misrepresentation in the media, we ignore the possibility of more points of view and impart media bias. 

CNN political commentator S.E. Cupp said, regarding her response to the first Covington video, that she “100% regrets reacting too quickly” after seeing the new videos, and that she wishes she “had the fuller picture before weighing in.” (Read more about Twitter and the Covington kids plus what journalist Farhad Manjoo thinks about “Twitter journalism” in this opinion piece from The New York Times.)

Our generation has to admit it: we like the Twitter news sphere because it’s easy and fast-paced. All you need to do to achieve some degree of expertise on a particular subject is find a thread that discusses it. Why bother reading tedious news articles when I can just skim a tweet? 

Journalists and Twitter have established some codependency where the former relies on the latter for information. Journalists contribute their legitimacy to Twitter every day, and Twitter relies on this legitimacy the same way we rely on Twitter as a news source. This cycle, according to NiemanLab’s predictions for journalism in 2020, characterizes news as a product. We’re adopting this habit of easy reading at the cost of journalists’ time and effort, ditching the necessary task of fact-checking altogether. 

The trivialization of news should be compelling us to learn how we can mindfully consume what is now regarded as “modern journalism” on social media. We must fact-check all Twitter threads on heavy topics like global conflicts, socioeconomic theory, and the like no matter who wrote them. Complicated subjects conveyed in a simpler, more casual manner may be the more appealing option—but how comfortable are we in knowing that we’re consciously absorbing information without scrutinizing its validity? 

An interesting article by the Columbia Journalism Review touches on the “yin and yang” of Twitter and modern journalism. As young people and non-journalists, it’s difficult for us to speak out on how Twitter should be treating journalists and vice versa without expertise. Instead, we should be focusing that energy on the way we treat Twitter and the journalists who deliver us news. But how should we be digesting all this material in the vast digital landscape?

Let’s cut to the chase: unbiased news isn’t a thing. While there are the facts—[insert event] has occurred in [insert place]—even reputable outlets still contain media bias with particular political leanings. Take The New York Times‘ preference for the left and Fox News‘ favor toward the right. Because of this, it’s good to have a go-to trusted source or two—outlets or journalists whose values and approach to news appear to align with yours. Don’t stop there, though; look for other perspectives. Dig deeper. When you encounter things that challenge your beliefs, take it as an opportunity for introspection. Avoid overly curating your news feed so that it perfectly conforms to your values. Wait for more details to transpire. Look for more perspectives and takes. This is a useful guide for avoiding misinformation—lies, tricks, and chaos—on social media. It’s pleasantly formatted and divided into numbered sections, and you should give it a place somewhere in your notes or bookmarks bar.

We’re living in a digital world where many of us have the privilege to access limitless, valuable knowledge—we should be making a conscious effort to consume news in ways that don’t harm journalists and aren’t conducive to the spread of false information. There’s time for everything; scroll through your news feed while having breakfast, when commuting, during breaks, after work. With your friends, your family, yourself. Everything is only a click away. Considering the massive amount of resources we now have in our hands, why cling to just Twitter?

 

By Jordinna Joaquin

Related Topics
  • ATTENTION
  • Jordinna Joaquin
  • news
  • politics
  • social media
  • Twitter
Previous Article
  • Life

On Love and Attention

  • August 21, 2020
  • Isabelle Robinson
View Post
Next Article
  • Sex & Love

How to Have the Perfect Threesome

  • August 21, 2020
  • Ana Salazar
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • News & Politics

Adopting the IHRA Definition Won’t Eradicate Anti-Semitism

  • March 29, 2021
  • Rebecca Driker-Ohren
View Post
  • News & Politics

White Rage in America: Where Will the Republican Party Go Next? 

  • March 24, 2021
  • Kiddest Sinke
View Post
  • News & Politics

Reconciling Anti-Semitism on the Left

  • March 20, 2021
  • Jenna Kalishman
View Post
  • News & Politics

Increased Policing Won’t Stop Attacks Against Asians, But Abolition Can 

  • March 11, 2021
  • Sarah Mae Dizon
View Post
  • News & Politics

How the Left Is Becoming Reactionary

  • March 4, 2021
  • Joseph Kay
View Post
  • News & Politics

r/WallStreetBets Was Never David

  • February 24, 2021
  • Jill Risberg
View Post
  • News & Politics

The $1,400 Question (and the Unwanted Unity in Its Answer)

  • February 18, 2021
  • Sophia Moore
View Post
  • News & Politics

The Impossibilities of Joe Biden’s COVID-Riddled America

  • January 31, 2021
  • Kenneth Kim

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    A Deep Dive Into the Darknet Drug Market
    • April 15, 2021
  • 2
    My Love-Hate Relationship with Email
    • April 14, 2021
  • 3
    Have You Thought About Your Neighbors Today?
    • April 13, 2021
  • 4
    How Capitalism Forces Us to Commodify Our Personal Lives
    • April 12, 2021
  • 5
    Don’t Call Rowing Blazers Founder Jack Carlson Preppy
    • April 9, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Discovering My Sexuality, Alone in My Childhood Bedroom
    • April 8, 2021
  • Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?
    • April 6, 2021
  • What’s Private Is Public: Drawing the Ethical Line as a Personal Essayist 
    • April 5, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (158)
  • Fashion & Beauty (33)
  • Life (149)
  • News & Politics (74)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (70)
Search
Instagram
Capitalism forces us to commodify our personal lives. Success is measured by profitability—and how well we can package our personal lives to gain likeability and engagement. And with that can come mistreatment, unethical acts that are difficult to fight against alone. Lithium writer @jordinna notes, “It is the role of the privileged to take a stand and bargain whenever necessary to pave the way for those unable to do so themselves. If you can safely express your opposition, complaints, or needs, you should, as you’ll be encouraging the development of a healthier and more ethical setting for those with precarious jobs.” Read about it now on Lithium ⚖️
In an interview with @jackcarlson, the founder of @rowingblazers, there are several tangents and an unabashed bluntness about the state of contemporary fashion and consumption. He doesn’t hesitate to name-drop when talking about everything he never wants Rowing Blazers to become—Rowing Blazers wants to turn stuffiness into self-awareness within the world of preppy style. Read our latest interview by @katwilliiams on Lithium ⚡️
From scrolling through Tumblr to inviting significant others in, @mayarpage’s bedroom was an inseparable part of discovering her sexuality. In her newest personal essay, she writes, “My old bedroom is a time capsule—it invokes the memories of my coming of age, the euphoric feelings of finding myself, feeling seen and loved. The door will always be open.” Read on Lithium now ⏳
Nowadays, good taste is a currency for clout. The rise of curation in all echelons of the cultural hierarchy results from the problem at the heart of digital consumerism: people don’t trust algorithms and are overwhelmed by choice. Curation, therefore, is the counterculture movement that restores meaning to content and products. But, with that comes concerns of gatekeeping and elitism and consumerism. Read @jvsli’s latest on Lithium now ⚡️
For personal essayists, what’s private often feels public. Are writers more preoccupied with protecting other people’s information than their own? Lithium writer @itsalicegarnett muses, No writer ever wants to receive the ‘is this about me?’ text, so we omit and we fine-tune to avoid conflict with the people in our lives. Still, thanks to writing so many personal essays, I’m struggling to draw the line between myself as Person versus myself as Writer.” Read more on the site now ✍️
Really, the new Billie Eilish documentary helps bridge the gap between the celebrity and her fans. @elliergreenberg writes, “With one foot in what’s left of her childhood—hanging with hometown friends, sleeping in her childhood bedroom, and spending time with her protective parents—Eilish is also beginning to step into adulthood, the process being considerably sped up by her burgeoning fame. This constant push and pull between her two worlds is ever-so-present throughout the film, speaking truth to the title—the world is spinning around Eilish, dizzying her in the process.” Read about it now on Lithium ⛓
The music industry slaps this label—“sad girl indie”—on any woman who expresses her emotions. It’s lazy at best but precarious at worst, revealing both the issues with the label and the need to invent more appropriate genres (or ditch categorization altogether). In her latest essay, @nat.geisel writes about the dilemma of the “sad indie girl” trope faced by artists from Phoebe Bridgers to Mitski, while men who share their emotions are applauded for their brilliance. Read more on the site now 🎶
Normalize disliking people for no particular reason. Let’s face it—we just don’t click with everyone we meet. And there doesn’t have to be beef. Don’t lead people on—you can make it clear there’s no friendship (whether it’s because you have nothing in common, you don’t vibe with them, or they just annoy you). After all, there’s a glow-up that comes with just not caring. Read @chelsiearia’s latest essay on the site now💫
A little party never killed anybody, right? In this hauntingly personal essay, Lauren Andrikanich reflects upon her party experiences from childhood to now, in the midst of a pandemic and a sense of losing herself. She writes, “The best time for parties is when you’re young, before you know that all the adults hate each other. Parties just don’t have the same feel to them after you’ve heard your mom’s best friend scream at your dad in the driveway of a costume party.” Read about it now on Lithium 🖤

Input your search keywords and press Enter.