Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • Activism, News, & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • Activism, News, & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Culture & Entertainment

As A Musician, Does Your Family Background Matter?

  • August 31, 2020
  • No comments
  • 6 minute read
  • Avery Matteo

Lately, I’ve been opening Twitter and finding my feed saturated with debates on privilege in the indie music world. I’ve seen people I follow learn that Frankie Cosmos is the daughter of two successful actors, and witnessed fans express disappointment that Clairo’s father—an advertising guru with ties to the music industry—likely played a role in crafting the easily marketable “soft girl” persona that endeared fans to her music.

These discoveries aren’t unfamiliar, as hierarchies of power and wealth in music are eerily similar to the broader economic inequalities that continue to worsen in the United States. And while digital platforms like YouTube and Soundcloud provide free opportunities for exposure and potential fame, working and middle-class individuals committed to professionally pursuing music still recognize that they’ll be clawing up a ladder while their rich counterparts launch past them on a high-speed elevator to critical acclaim and financial success. 

The music industry operates like the intricately painted core of a Russian nesting doll. It sits at the center of the mountainous disparities that have debilitated the average person’s chances for success in nearly every lucrative, entertainment-related profession—trapping many artists with modest backgrounds under the country’s systemic wealth disparities. In fact, the music industry mirrors the U.S. economy so markedly that former White House Chief Economist Alan Krueger used it to discuss the distinctions and ambiguities associated with how wealth affects success in a 2013 speech at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.

“The music industry is a microcosm of what is happening in the U.S. economy at large. We are increasingly becoming a ‘winner-take-all’ economy, a phenomenon that the music industry has long experienced… The lucky and the talented—and it is often hard to tell the difference—have been doing better and better, while the vast majority has struggled to keep up,” he acknowledged.

Krueger’s statement conjures a vital question that I see posed on social media in many forms: are the musicians we know and love lucky, talented, or both? And if it’s determined among fans that they are both, does the financial support from family that helped them get off the ground diminish their previously awarded artistic merit?

While there may not be an answer to that question, many fans and musicians are becoming more vocal about the wariness they feel toward artists with generational wealth. Fans and non-wealthy musicians alike want to prioritize elevating the careers of ordinary musicians like them who deserve the same opportunities—and public platform—to show off their talents. 

But there’s another online community that harbors more malicious intent. I frequently encounter people on social media who are perpetually out for blood, desperate to fabricate a personal stake in whatever conflict happens to be trending. These contributions often lessen the nuance that is so vital in discussions about the worthiness of work produced by trust fund babies and those with questionable pasts. It’s easy to write someone off as canceled and deem them unworthy of further thought—but there’s a major problem with this line of behavior. Cancel culture isn’t one-size-fits-all, or always fair, and the controversies that follow popular indie musicians King Princess and Mitski exemplify how online judgments of morality and professional merit can go terribly wrong.

To kick off 2019, I attended a show on King Princess’s Cheap Queen tour. At the time, the artist held an undeniably god-like status. She had natural swagger, a sultry voice, and an irresistibility among her mostly queer, female fanbase. At the venue, I tuned into the conversations of other concertgoers—mostly high schoolers and college-aged women—and discovered that they did, predictably, hold her in high regard. As one of the teeangers standing in front of me excitedly shouted to her friend, King Princess was a “queer savior.” But since the last time I saw her perform, her status as an icon has faltered in my eyes. 

In a September 2019 interview with Vulture, King Princess discussed her song “Cheap Queen,” the title of which was borrowed (or more accurately, appropriated) from drag culture:

“I was going to name the album after the interlude because it was so cute… It’s an homage to my community. We are all cheap queens. It’s a drag term for someone who is resourceful, who makes something out of nothing, who is a creator on a budget. That’s how I feel.”

There are numerous misunderstandings and indications of privilege packed in her words. Calling the phrase cheap queen “cute” is reductive, and she trivializes the existence of the drag queens who coined the phrase by asserting that the term is universally applicable. But in actuality, there’s a specific context in which the phrase should be used. A cheap queen—according to the sparse examples of its original usage I miraculously found buried in King Princess’s monopolization of my search results—is someone who manages to thrive creatively despite facing meager finances and backlash for participating in drag culture.

King Princess has never faced these challenges or forms of oppression. And to be frank, her upbringing has never been cheap. She grew up in Mission Sound, her father’s New York recording studio, with access to all the connections, equipment, and resources she desired. She also hails from a long line of generational money—her great-grandfather was Isidor Straus, former U.S. Congressman and co-owner of Macy’s. While Straus has stated that she doesn’t directly receive familial money, she struggles to understand that the privilege awarded to her by her lineage—and exposure to the inner workings of music production from an early age—gave her a networking advantage rather than a financial one.

King Princess has yet to address her upbringing, issue an apology for her questionable use of drag aesthetics and elements, or acknowledge that her position as a queer music icon has been tainted amidst relatively abundant backlash.

These reasons are precisely why her background and the criticism surrounding it do matter. She has the ability to opt in and out of identities whenever is convenient for her, a privilege that the community she takes inspiration from doesn’t have. And, as is made clear by her eyebrow-raising Vulture interview, she desperately wants to convince fans that she made something out of nothing, though she’s only ever known a world of abundance.

Mitski, on the other hand, has had to capitulate to a more passive, unfair role in the controversy that clouds her public persona. For months, fans have alleged that her father is a CIA operative who participated in a violent 1980s regime change in the Congo. While there hasn’t been an official statement confirming the claims, his undetermined role within the State Department meant the singer’s family had the financial capacity to send Mitski to Purchase College’s Conservatory of Music, where she transferred to study studio compositions.

While Mitski has experienced a share of the advantages held by King Princess, she’s faced an onslaught of career-shaking criticism that the latter never has. People online accuse Mitski of protecting her father by declining to speak publicly about his former career, despite the fact that she’s likely prohibited from doing so. It’s also unfair to hold the 29-year old musician accountable for her father’s past actions, as she has expressed in numerous interviews her desire to shed the years of loneliness associated with living in seven different locations due to his job.

The King Princess and Mitski controversies show that family backgrounds only matter if you decide to make them matter. King Princess’s tendency to flaunt or conceal her familial privilege with queerness is sometimes exploitative, but Mitski’s decision to separate herself from her potential CIA operative father whose job contributed to past trauma simply isn’t—no matter which angle you look at it.

As fans with valued voices in online music communities, it’s our responsibility to spark constructive discourse rather than drama. It isn’t feasible, or fair, to condemn every artist who was fortunate enough to study music in college or happened to grow up adjacent to the industry. However, it is important to note when people are unaware of—or are reckless with—the concessions they’ve been provided. And, most importantly, it’s vital that we treat every conversation, musician, and situation with the individualized attention it deserves.

 

By Avery Matteo

Related Topics
  • ATTENTION
  • Avery Matteo
  • music
Previous Article
  • Activism, News, & Politics

“WitchTok” and the New Wave of Political Spirituality

  • August 31, 2020
  • Kiddest Sinke
View Post
Next Article
  • Life

The Mortifying Ordeal of Being Interesting

  • September 1, 2020
  • Anonmyous
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?

  • March 1, 2021
  • Katherine Williams
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain

  • February 28, 2021
  • Tamara Jones
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

“Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020

  • February 28, 2021
  • Kaiya Shunyata
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino

  • February 27, 2021
  • Kaiya Shunyata
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Why You Should Reject Music Elitism

  • February 26, 2021
  • Ellie Greenberg
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Middle School Ends, But “Pen15” Is Forever 

  • February 26, 2021
  • Jadie Stillwell
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

How TV About Getting Lost Taught Me About Survival

  • February 25, 2021
  • Alex Eichenstein
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

An Ode to Garage Bands and Punk Shows Past

  • February 25, 2021
  • Sheena Holt

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    Sexual Empowerment or Reckless Endangerment?
    • March 2, 2021
  • 2
    What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?
    • March 1, 2021
  • 3
    Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain
    • February 28, 2021
  • 4
    “Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020
    • February 28, 2021
  • 5
    Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino
    • February 27, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Why You Should Reject Music Elitism
    • February 26, 2021
  • Middle School Ends, But “Pen15” Is Forever 
    • February 26, 2021
  • How TV About Getting Lost Taught Me About Survival
    • February 25, 2021
Categories
  • Activism, News, & Politics (69)
  • Culture & Entertainment (141)
  • Fashion & Beauty (31)
  • Life (133)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (68)
Search
Instagram
OnlyFans, selling worn underwear, sex work—are these acts of sexual empowerment or reckless endangerment? As Modesty Sanchez writes, “Because OnlyFans creators are portrayed as entrepreneurs taking control of their image and brand, the role that the platform itself plays is often obscured and dismissed, especially since the company prefers to hide behind the feminist, sex-positive glow emanating from the sex workers that have flocked to the site.” Often, the dangers of online and IRL sex work are simply swept to the side while corporate exploitation is covered up by a girl boss narrative. Read the latest on Lithium now ⚡️
What’s the point of “Fake Accounts”? Written by Lauren Oyler, Fake Accounts is a perfect addition to the list of much-overhyped millennial reading: Normal People, Bad Feminist, How to Do Nothing, etc. And if Oyler wasn’t such a harsh critic of that specific literary circle, this novel would just be another pretty well-written, unmoving book. But Oyler has gone after too many media darlings like Sally Rooney, Jia Tolentino and Roxane Gay in open takedowns that center on her distaste for moralizing, self-absorbed, digital-first writing. Read Lithium writer @katwilliiams take on this book, live on the site now 📚
Britney Spears, Tessica Brown “Gorilla Glue Girl,” and trauma porn all have something in common—they are representations of our fascination with women’s pain. In @tamaravjones’s latest piece for Lithium, she points out that “It’s up to readers to support better journalism and think about the consequences before sharing their unfiltered hot takes on social media. Britney Spears’ legal battle will continue and inevitably, someone else will take Tessica Brown’s spot as the internet’s main character, and I can only hope that we manage to break this cycle before someone else gets hurt.” Live on Lithium now 💫
Playboi Carti’s newest album Whole Lotta Red is the rapper’s ARTPOP. While it’s different from a lot of the rap dominating the Billboard 100, Carti does something a lot of mainstream acts are afraid to do: experiment. Lithium writer @kaiya.shunyata dives deep into Whole Lotta Red and discusses how the album, like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP, is a fantastic work of exploration and departure from the rap that mostly dominated 2020. Read about it now 🎧
When you’re first getting into film, you tend to hear the same names repeated over and over again: Fincher, Scorsese, and, most of all, Tarantino. But when @kaiya.shunyata rewatched his directorial debut Reservoir Dogs, she couldn’t help but think of his mistreatment of actresses (notably, Uma Thurman), his use of the N-word in films, sprinkled in like a garnish he and his fans can’t live without, and decades of controversies. She writes, “It’s become impossible to ignore the way Tarantino has been worshipped, while simultaneously not changing the things for which he’s been criticized.” Read about it on Lithium now 🎬
Middle school sux. Hulu’s Pen15 follows thirteen-year-old best friends Maya and Anna as they tackle an endless seventh-grade year. From day one, they face humiliations that only strike when you are thirteen, like bad haircuts and periods. But Pen15 sets itself apart from all the other middle school dramas by not only having good stories and actors, but drawing attention to the fact that even performing thirteen is a complex thing. Read about it now on Lithium, written by Jade Stillwell 📚
We’re all culprits in contributing to the shame and embarrassment that have become synonymous with listening to specific artists. Rex Orange County has become the unofficial pinnacle of a wannabe-indie girl who’s a regular Urban Outfitters patron. A Smiths fan is egotistical and decidedly unable to get laid. Bon Iver attracts the coffee shop connoisseur with a God complex. @elliergreenberg’s latest is all about why you should reject music elitism— this one is a must-read. Live on Lithium now 🎵
@holt.sheena’s latest piece is an ode to garage bands and punk shows past. She writes, “I loved every part of it—the moshing (which I observed, perplexed, from the sidelines), the music, the sense of belonging.” Read her latest piece on Lithium now 🎸
Shows about getting lost are meaningful in a lot of different ways, especially during the pandemic. Watching shows like Lost and Survivor make us wonder, “how do people skip their skincare routine for more than a week?” to deeper examinations of trust and acts of selflessness when storylines like allies and sacrifice come into play. Alex Eich writes, “These are both stories about our magnificent, if inconvenient, need for other people. And they taught me to find beauty in a shared will to survive.” Read about it now on Lithium 🏝

Input your search keywords and press Enter.