Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Sex & Love

How to Love With Political Differences

  • September 9, 2020
  • No comments
  • 5 minute read
  • Jordinna Joaquin

Everything changes when you fall in love. That was the case for me, at least—I gave so many parts of myself away, compromising my values for a guy who’d barely read a book in his life. We had hardly anything in common aside from a few of the same bands in our Spotify playlists, and I was always known to be the more outspoken one. But when it came to politics, I found that we were on opposite sides of the spectrum—or he took no side at all.

I was beginning to be more vocal on Instagram about social issues when I got into this relationship. I enjoyed reading and participating in online discourse, casually talking politics with my friends, debating my older brother on different social theories. I naturally disliked anyone whose beliefs radically contrasted mine, and that saved me from a lot of potentially mentally-draining friendships. But when I caught feelings for a boy whose idea of humor lied in niche meme accounts and casual misogyny, I became a stranger to my morals. The façade of a simple, apolitical relationship was immensely appealing to me back then. If I had to shut up about feminism and civil rights so we could lay in bed and listen to music together in peace, I thought, then I happily would.

My ex would often subtly criticize me for speaking out on topics he found annoying or uninteresting for the duration of our six-month relationship. Whenever I posted on social media or tried to start conversations with him about social justice, he’d passive-aggressively intervene. I’d say a thing or two, shrug, and then laugh at whatever ignorant joke he’d told to make light of the situation. “It’s not a big deal,” he’d say. “I don’t understand why you care about this so much.” I was (and still am) a passionate, pro-choice, mostly anti-capitalist feminist. He, on the other hand, perpetuated internalized racism through his “dark sense of humor,” and I pretended to be okay with all the dark memes he sent me for both our sakes. It made me uncomfortable, and I often felt guilty for betraying my beliefs, but back then, I thought I like this boy so much that nothing I believe in should matter more than my love for him.

Really, I haven’t had any worthwhile experiences dating my political opposites. But I now know what to expect from an ideal significant other because of these relationships, whether or not our politics clash. Mutual respect and understanding are the foundations of any relationship, but there’s a unique boundary for political discussions. Everybody’s different: while some may enjoy heated intellectual debates with their partners and even find that attractive and stimulating, others (like me) would storm out in frustration or, in worse cases, cry like a child.

I recently asked a handful of friends for their take on dating with political differences. What I gathered is that how you tackle clashing politics in romance truly depends on who you are and where you come from. Some of my friends were merely apathetic. Some believed that political differences make for engaging discussions wherein partners can separate politics from their love lives. But you have to have a certain amount of privilege to make that distinction—to have personal experiences so exemplary that you aren’t, to some extent, defined by your politics. 

When you’re in love, do you even bother thinking about the moral upper hand? That depends on how you approach politics in the first place. Is it a part of you? Does it reflect who you are as a person? Or do you feel no personal connection to your political beliefs at all? If my partner didn’t support some of the progressive ideas that I propagate, would I like him less, after all the love and affection he’d given me? 

There are, of course, political values that are simply non-negotiable. Do yourself a favor and look for lovers whose beliefs don’t fundamentally disrespect your very existence—your race, gender, sexuality, religion, class. Your politics become a lot more personal in this sense: you shouldn’t pursue someone who believes in policies that harm you or those close to you. If my boyfriend blamed what I was wearing when I told him I’d gotten catcalled, for example, I could easily ditch him. If I spoke ardently on LGBT rights in defense of my lesbian friends’ struggles and my boyfriend disagreed or was “neutral,” my feelings for him would definitely shift. In this case, I feel that love wouldn’t even be nearly enough to sustain a relationship, if any real love can come out of such extreme opposites at all. 

But why do we find ourselves attracted to our political opposites in the first place? Somebody I spoke to believes that love transcends all values, even political ones. Love is universal, he said, and anyone from any part of the political spectrum can experience it. “You can choose to love someone just because you’re a free and rational economic agent. Or you can love someone because you’re a part of a larger community. Or you can love someone because you see yourself as a conservative patriot.” 

That conversation made me think of how Karl Marx argued that human nature’s essence is in our drive to create products that give us social and individual satisfaction, instead of the traditional conception of human nature as a species that “incarnates itself in each individual.” We are reflections of the social relations we are born into and the ones in which we choose to engage. When we look at it this way, we can understand that human nature isn’t static or permanent; there’s no golden rule for how to date your political opposites. There’s no set standard for the role politics play in relationship dynamics. You choose who you love, and you love them because you want to. Maybe, despite all your differences and contradicting values, you see a part of yourself—detached from politics—in them.

How you and your partner approach politics, boundaries, and non-negotiable beliefs is all on you and your identities. Some of us can look past politics when we’re in love because romance can be so immense and encompassing, while others may find that their politics is such an indispensable part of them that it would be impossible to sacrifice that for someone else. Know who you are and what you stand for before you enter any relationship, and remember that politics is draining—true love is not.

 

By Jordinna Joaquin

Illustration by Teresa Woodcock

Related Topics
  • dating
  • Jordinna Joaquin
  • LUXURY
  • politics
  • relationships
  • Teresa Woodcock
Previous Article
  • Life

Privilege, Partying, and the “Work Hard, Play Harder” Lifestyle 

  • September 9, 2020
  • Alice Garnett
View Post
Next Article
  • Sex & Love

In Defense of the Adulteress

  • September 10, 2020
  • Modesty Sanchez
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Sometimes, It’s Okay to Ghost

  • March 22, 2021
  • Irene Schrader
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Somebody Tell Sixteen-Year-Olds Choking Isn’t Vanilla

  • March 12, 2021
  • Maya Page
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Sexual Empowerment or Reckless Endangerment?

  • March 2, 2021
  • Modesty Sanchez
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Our Lady of Autoeroticism: Catholicism, Capitalism, and Female Masturbation

  • February 16, 2021
  • Andrea Panaligan
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Craving a COVID Hoe Phase

  • January 28, 2021
  • Maya Page
View Post
  • Sex & Love

I’m (Not) Sorry for Ghosting You

  • January 14, 2021
  • Tamara Jones
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Writing Desire

  • December 15, 2020
  • Sofia Sears
View Post
  • Sex & Love

Fun Date Ideas for These Uncertain Times

  • December 11, 2020
  • MJ Brown

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    A Deep Dive Into the Darknet Drug Market
    • April 15, 2021
  • 2
    My Love-Hate Relationship with Email
    • April 14, 2021
  • 3
    Have You Thought About Your Neighbors Today?
    • April 13, 2021
  • 4
    How Capitalism Forces Us to Commodify Our Personal Lives
    • April 12, 2021
  • 5
    Don’t Call Rowing Blazers Founder Jack Carlson Preppy
    • April 9, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Discovering My Sexuality, Alone in My Childhood Bedroom
    • April 8, 2021
  • Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?
    • April 6, 2021
  • What’s Private Is Public: Drawing the Ethical Line as a Personal Essayist 
    • April 5, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (158)
  • Fashion & Beauty (33)
  • Life (149)
  • News & Politics (74)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (70)
Search
Instagram
Capitalism forces us to commodify our personal lives. Success is measured by profitability—and how well we can package our personal lives to gain likeability and engagement. And with that can come mistreatment, unethical acts that are difficult to fight against alone. Lithium writer @jordinna notes, “It is the role of the privileged to take a stand and bargain whenever necessary to pave the way for those unable to do so themselves. If you can safely express your opposition, complaints, or needs, you should, as you’ll be encouraging the development of a healthier and more ethical setting for those with precarious jobs.” Read about it now on Lithium ⚖️
In an interview with @jackcarlson, the founder of @rowingblazers, there are several tangents and an unabashed bluntness about the state of contemporary fashion and consumption. He doesn’t hesitate to name-drop when talking about everything he never wants Rowing Blazers to become—Rowing Blazers wants to turn stuffiness into self-awareness within the world of preppy style. Read our latest interview by @katwilliiams on Lithium ⚡️
From scrolling through Tumblr to inviting significant others in, @mayarpage’s bedroom was an inseparable part of discovering her sexuality. In her newest personal essay, she writes, “My old bedroom is a time capsule—it invokes the memories of my coming of age, the euphoric feelings of finding myself, feeling seen and loved. The door will always be open.” Read on Lithium now ⏳
Nowadays, good taste is a currency for clout. The rise of curation in all echelons of the cultural hierarchy results from the problem at the heart of digital consumerism: people don’t trust algorithms and are overwhelmed by choice. Curation, therefore, is the counterculture movement that restores meaning to content and products. But, with that comes concerns of gatekeeping and elitism and consumerism. Read @jvsli’s latest on Lithium now ⚡️
For personal essayists, what’s private often feels public. Are writers more preoccupied with protecting other people’s information than their own? Lithium writer @itsalicegarnett muses, No writer ever wants to receive the ‘is this about me?’ text, so we omit and we fine-tune to avoid conflict with the people in our lives. Still, thanks to writing so many personal essays, I’m struggling to draw the line between myself as Person versus myself as Writer.” Read more on the site now ✍️
Really, the new Billie Eilish documentary helps bridge the gap between the celebrity and her fans. @elliergreenberg writes, “With one foot in what’s left of her childhood—hanging with hometown friends, sleeping in her childhood bedroom, and spending time with her protective parents—Eilish is also beginning to step into adulthood, the process being considerably sped up by her burgeoning fame. This constant push and pull between her two worlds is ever-so-present throughout the film, speaking truth to the title—the world is spinning around Eilish, dizzying her in the process.” Read about it now on Lithium ⛓
The music industry slaps this label—“sad girl indie”—on any woman who expresses her emotions. It’s lazy at best but precarious at worst, revealing both the issues with the label and the need to invent more appropriate genres (or ditch categorization altogether). In her latest essay, @nat.geisel writes about the dilemma of the “sad indie girl” trope faced by artists from Phoebe Bridgers to Mitski, while men who share their emotions are applauded for their brilliance. Read more on the site now 🎶
Normalize disliking people for no particular reason. Let’s face it—we just don’t click with everyone we meet. And there doesn’t have to be beef. Don’t lead people on—you can make it clear there’s no friendship (whether it’s because you have nothing in common, you don’t vibe with them, or they just annoy you). After all, there’s a glow-up that comes with just not caring. Read @chelsiearia’s latest essay on the site now💫
A little party never killed anybody, right? In this hauntingly personal essay, Lauren Andrikanich reflects upon her party experiences from childhood to now, in the midst of a pandemic and a sense of losing herself. She writes, “The best time for parties is when you’re young, before you know that all the adults hate each other. Parties just don’t have the same feel to them after you’ve heard your mom’s best friend scream at your dad in the driveway of a costume party.” Read about it now on Lithium 🖤

Input your search keywords and press Enter.