Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Culture & Entertainment

We’ll Never Be Royals: A Closer Look at Historical Fiction Films

  • December 8, 2020
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • Irine Le

One photo that lives in my head rent-free is a behind-the-scenes shot of Kirsten Dunst and Jason Schwartzmann from Sofia Coppola’s 2006 film Marie Antoinette. Dunst is dressed as Marie Antoinette, complete with a poofy ball gown, stunning face of makeup, and wig. Schwartzmann is sitting next to her in similarly formal attire, holding up a Macbook, while Kirsten has headphones in her ears. 

Both are dressed up as 18th-century French nobility—and then there’s a Macbook. It’s a weirdly funny shot. Marie Antoinette remains one of my favorite films—the soundtrack is impeccable (featuring The Strokes, Siouxsie Sioux, and the Banshees), the pastel aesthetics are dreamy, and I’m generally a sucker for historical fiction films. 

I read The Royal Diaries, a children’s historical fiction series, when I was in elementary school, which completely piqued my interest in royal history. Each book was written in the form of diary entries, focused on a different historic queen’s teenage years in relation to large-scale historical events. The queens ranged from Queen Victoria to Cleopatra to Grand Duchess Anastasia and more. 

Though The Royal Diaries only focused on the queens’ teenhood and contained fictional dialogue, the books gave me a good foundation in learning about royal history when it came to the events and people mentioned. 

In many contemporary historical royal fiction shows and movies, it often feels like there’s an emphasis on highlighting extravagance and luxury—not just sticking to what’s written in history books. And I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t fascinated by the frilly gowns, sparkling jewelry, and fast-paced, dramatic, romantic storylines in these films and shows. 

TV shows like Hulu’s The Great and The CW’s Reign are dramatized, fictionalized takes on the coming-of-age experiences of Catherine the Great and Mary, Queen of Scots, respectively. Reign creator Laurie McCarthy has maintained that the show should be approached as entertainment—not an accurate representation of history. Adelaide Kane, who plays Mary, has defended the show’s highly fictionalized elements, calling it creative license. Kane mentioned that when she was a teen (Reign’s target audience age), history definitely wasn’t at the forefront of her mind. Despite this, Kane prepared well for the role, doing heavy research and getting to know the life and personality of Mary, Queen of Scots.

“In each episode, we’ll educate people on what element of history helps our story,” McCarthy explained. McCarthy believes that though Reign is highly fictionalized, it still provides viewers with some background knowledge of royal history. 

The Great, starring Elle Fanning and Nicholas Hoult as Catherine the Great and Tsar Peter III, respectively, has been described by Hulu itself as “anti-historical”—even the title screen in the first episode says, “An occasional true story.” The Great’s first season shows Fanning arriving in Russia as a young German princess at age 19, and staging a coup the year after. In actuality, the real Catherine the Great arrived in Russia at age 14 as young Princess Sophie, got married at 16, and didn’t become Empress of Russia until she was 32.

It’s often a source of debate if Marie Antoinette callously said “let them eat cake” in response to learning that the French peasant population was struggling with famine and hunger during the French Revolution. Still, the phrase has floated across centuries. 

Whether Marie Antoinette really said it or not, the infamous phrase’s sentiments have upheld her infamous reputation in history books as France’s inconsiderate and apathetic last queen until the monarchy’s abolition and her subsequent execution in 1793. “Let them eat cake,” fictionalized or not, represents someone who was unaware of and careless regarding the French population’s plights during the revolution. 

But in Coppola’s Marie Antoinette, the cake motif isn’t lost. There are scenes of Kirsten Dunst, sprawled on couches in a ruffled white gown, surrounded by an endless amount of carefully decorated cakes and pastries. The pink frosting matches the tulle of Dunst’s dress and her rhinestone heels. The scene plays up ideas of extravagance and luxury—pastel colors, feminine objects, and dream-like cinematography are often noted as constant themes across Coppola’s films, a testament to how she utilized her own creativity and personal style to tell Marie Antoinette’s story.

It’s fascinating to see how directors and showrunners creatively interpret different eras and historical figures. Many movies and shows depicting historical fiction play up factors like costumes and visual aesthetics more than the hard facts, the main premise and characters aside. In a way, it reminds me of fan fiction. In most if not all of these stories, the key characters remain while fans dream up fantastical interactions. Fan fiction about Harry Potter gave us Twilight, Twilight fan fiction gave us Fifty Shades of Grey, and so on. Even if royal historical fictional media has slip-ups and inaccuracies, it’s fiction for a reason.

When I decided to major in history in college, I chose to focus on building on my writing and reading skills while studying the historical figures I’d always loved. But sometimes it just gets boring shuffling through outdated history textbooks and grainy YouTube documentaries for research papers. To me, it can be more engaging to watch Sofia Coppola’s creative, colorful interpretation of Marie Antoinette, or Jonathan Rhys Meyers and Natalie Dormer’s torrid affair as King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn in The Tudors, than reading the straight facts. Really, whether or not these films are enjoyable despite their inaccuracies is entirely up to the viewer.

 

By Irine Le

Related Topics
  • BITCH
  • film
  • history
  • Irine Le
  • movies
  • television
  • tv
Previous Article
  • Culture & Entertainment

Let’s Unpack Samantha Jones from “Sex and the City”

  • December 7, 2020
  • Gabriella Ferrigine
View Post
Next Article
  • Life

I Went Against My Family’s Wants and I’m Happier Than Ever

  • December 9, 2020
  • Aarohi Sheth
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?

  • April 6, 2021
  • Jasmine Li
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Stop Expecting “Sad Indie Girls” to Be Sad All the Time

  • April 2, 2021
  • Natalie Geisel
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Billie Eilish’s Documentary Closes the Gap Between Celebrities and Fans

  • April 1, 2021
  • Ellie Greenberg
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Cosplaying the Working Class: The Ethics of Fictional Poverty in Cinema

  • March 29, 2021
  • Jasmine Li
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Uninspired, Glum, Hopeless? Look No Further Than Modern Love

  • March 26, 2021
  • Sophia Peyser
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Donna Missal’s Quarantine Creation: Introducing “sex is good (but have you tried)”

  • March 25, 2021
  • Julianna Chen
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

Finding Catharsis in Painful Cinema

  • March 25, 2021
  • Kaiya Shunyata
View Post
  • Culture & Entertainment

“Fleabag” and the Beauty in Everyday Pain

  • March 24, 2021
  • Sophia Peyser

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    A Deep Dive Into the Darknet Drug Market
    • April 15, 2021
  • 2
    My Love-Hate Relationship with Email
    • April 14, 2021
  • 3
    Have You Thought About Your Neighbors Today?
    • April 13, 2021
  • 4
    How Capitalism Forces Us to Commodify Our Personal Lives
    • April 12, 2021
  • 5
    Don’t Call Rowing Blazers Founder Jack Carlson Preppy
    • April 9, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Discovering My Sexuality, Alone in My Childhood Bedroom
    • April 8, 2021
  • Are Tastemakers the New Influencers?
    • April 6, 2021
  • What’s Private Is Public: Drawing the Ethical Line as a Personal Essayist 
    • April 5, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (158)
  • Fashion & Beauty (33)
  • Life (149)
  • News & Politics (74)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (70)
Search
Instagram
Capitalism forces us to commodify our personal lives. Success is measured by profitability—and how well we can package our personal lives to gain likeability and engagement. And with that can come mistreatment, unethical acts that are difficult to fight against alone. Lithium writer @jordinna notes, “It is the role of the privileged to take a stand and bargain whenever necessary to pave the way for those unable to do so themselves. If you can safely express your opposition, complaints, or needs, you should, as you’ll be encouraging the development of a healthier and more ethical setting for those with precarious jobs.” Read about it now on Lithium ⚖️
In an interview with @jackcarlson, the founder of @rowingblazers, there are several tangents and an unabashed bluntness about the state of contemporary fashion and consumption. He doesn’t hesitate to name-drop when talking about everything he never wants Rowing Blazers to become—Rowing Blazers wants to turn stuffiness into self-awareness within the world of preppy style. Read our latest interview by @katwilliiams on Lithium ⚡️
From scrolling through Tumblr to inviting significant others in, @mayarpage’s bedroom was an inseparable part of discovering her sexuality. In her newest personal essay, she writes, “My old bedroom is a time capsule—it invokes the memories of my coming of age, the euphoric feelings of finding myself, feeling seen and loved. The door will always be open.” Read on Lithium now ⏳
Nowadays, good taste is a currency for clout. The rise of curation in all echelons of the cultural hierarchy results from the problem at the heart of digital consumerism: people don’t trust algorithms and are overwhelmed by choice. Curation, therefore, is the counterculture movement that restores meaning to content and products. But, with that comes concerns of gatekeeping and elitism and consumerism. Read @jvsli’s latest on Lithium now ⚡️
For personal essayists, what’s private often feels public. Are writers more preoccupied with protecting other people’s information than their own? Lithium writer @itsalicegarnett muses, No writer ever wants to receive the ‘is this about me?’ text, so we omit and we fine-tune to avoid conflict with the people in our lives. Still, thanks to writing so many personal essays, I’m struggling to draw the line between myself as Person versus myself as Writer.” Read more on the site now ✍️
Really, the new Billie Eilish documentary helps bridge the gap between the celebrity and her fans. @elliergreenberg writes, “With one foot in what’s left of her childhood—hanging with hometown friends, sleeping in her childhood bedroom, and spending time with her protective parents—Eilish is also beginning to step into adulthood, the process being considerably sped up by her burgeoning fame. This constant push and pull between her two worlds is ever-so-present throughout the film, speaking truth to the title—the world is spinning around Eilish, dizzying her in the process.” Read about it now on Lithium ⛓
The music industry slaps this label—“sad girl indie”—on any woman who expresses her emotions. It’s lazy at best but precarious at worst, revealing both the issues with the label and the need to invent more appropriate genres (or ditch categorization altogether). In her latest essay, @nat.geisel writes about the dilemma of the “sad indie girl” trope faced by artists from Phoebe Bridgers to Mitski, while men who share their emotions are applauded for their brilliance. Read more on the site now 🎶
Normalize disliking people for no particular reason. Let’s face it—we just don’t click with everyone we meet. And there doesn’t have to be beef. Don’t lead people on—you can make it clear there’s no friendship (whether it’s because you have nothing in common, you don’t vibe with them, or they just annoy you). After all, there’s a glow-up that comes with just not caring. Read @chelsiearia’s latest essay on the site now💫
A little party never killed anybody, right? In this hauntingly personal essay, Lauren Andrikanich reflects upon her party experiences from childhood to now, in the midst of a pandemic and a sense of losing herself. She writes, “The best time for parties is when you’re young, before you know that all the adults hate each other. Parties just don’t have the same feel to them after you’ve heard your mom’s best friend scream at your dad in the driveway of a costume party.” Read about it now on Lithium 🖤

Input your search keywords and press Enter.