Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • News & Politics

The $1,400 Question (and the Unwanted Unity in Its Answer)

  • February 18, 2021
  • No comments
  • 4 minute read
  • Sophia Moore

We, the people, in order to form a more perfect Union, will repeatedly be overlooked by our government in favor of corporate bids and political allegiances. Welcome to the United States. 

2020 was a tumultuous year for politics and public health, and 2021 is proving equivalent. With the coronavirus pandemic continuing to peak in the United States, aid and relief from the effects of the pandemic are at the forefront of policy in D.C. In a time of crisis, wouldn’t one expect a nation’s politicians to step up and provide for the people? Apparently not. Back in March of 2020, the U.S. government released its first round of stimulus checks, pandemic aid in the form of $1,200. And now, again in January 2021, stimulus checks are back on the table. The catch? No one can decide on how much. 

At this point in the game, we’ve heard different numbers from the current and upcoming administrations in terms of how much money we deserve. From $600 to $2,000, the number has fluctuated across party lines for the last few weeks. The second stimulus package under Trump provides $600 per eligible person, which is significantly less than the original $1,200 from his first stimulus package. And now, days out from his inauguration, Biden is proposing a $1,400 stimulus per eligible person, pending decisions made by Congress. 

From the headlines alone, it’s clear that the U.S. government doesn’t quite know how much to issue to the people. Over the last ten months, unemployment and financial hardship have peaked for Americans, the highest rates since the Great Depression. So, knowing that the government’s responsibility is, in theory, to provide for the common good and well-being of the population, why is it that we’re still arguing about how much aid Americans deserve? Why is it “progressive” to advocate for $2,000 stimulus checks, and why must we push party politics onto providing welfare in the most serious financial and public health crisis we’ve seen in our lifetime?

To play on party stereotypes, Republicans are typically more fiscally conservative and Democrats are interested in fighting for financial stability. To many, this translates to one party being better than the other, because one cares about giving money to the people and the other doesn’t. The politically aware self-aggrandize: because one party boasts BLM signs and the other doesn’t, Democrats are automatically superior because they, you know, care about people. Right? 

To a certain extent, yes. Obviously the past four years have taught us that one party publicly advocates for more equality than the other. However, if we take a closer look at our Representatives and Senators on both sides of the aisle, we’ll see they’re not so different after all. 

The stimulus question is the epitome of Democrats and Republicans fighting the exact same fight. Both parties are concerned with the economics of the issue—how much our government can afford to spare for the people. Meanwhile, other countries have provided economic relief to their citizens amongst other benefits, such as food support and expanded health insurance. Fundamentally, if the U.S. government really cared about its citizens, we would not be vying for only our second stimulus check in the last ten months. Besides, it’s obvious that $600, $1,200, or even $2,000 is not enough to live on. And even if a decision was made, Congress would still take months to finalize the legislation. I understand the sluggish rate at which decisions in the legislative branch are made, and I understand that often, it is GOP congressmen who oppose the higher spending costs, but that’s beside the point. The fact that neither party can decide on how much our lives are worth—the fact that COVID-related aid isn’t the beating heart of the legislative branch right now—demonstrates the disconnect between Congress and its constituents. 

Maybe it’s hard to swing a compromise on the stimulus check issue, but shouldn’t proposals like Medicare for All be the current fire of both parties? Apparently not. Even progressive sweetheart Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez noted that the votes weren’t in the Democrats’ favor on the issue, so Democrats dropped that issue. Meanwhile, the number of Americans living without health insurance has increased thanks to the influx of job losses at the onset of the pandemic. AOC, the very poster child of the progressive movement in D.C. politics, opts to shield her party’s interests despite her desire to work for all of us. 

To be frank, the United States is in a terrible spot right now. Politically and socially, the ugly, inequitable base on which our country was built is exposing itself and no one on Capitol Hill seems to know how to fix it. When faced with injustice, Democrats kneel and propose equalizing legislation. That same legislation, though, barely attacks the systemic issues facing communities of color. When faced with a pandemic, both parties disagree on how to handle the relief funding of some, not all, Americans, because of course, not everyone qualifies for the stimulus. In the former situation, Democrats strike to save face as the liberal party; in the latter, politicians on both sides find common ground when holding back funding for the people. At least there’s something both parties can agree on. 

 

By Sophia Moore

Visual by Kaylina Kodlick

Related Topics
  • coronavirus
  • COVID-19
  • economics
  • Kaylina Kodlick
  • money
  • pandemic
  • PARTY
  • politics
  • Sophia Moore
Previous Article
  • Culture & Entertainment

“Create Dangerously” in the Wake of 2020

  • February 18, 2021
  • Colette Bernheim
View Post
Next Article
  • Culture & Entertainment

Local Trans Guy Binges Every Elliot Page Project

  • February 19, 2021
  • Jack Loney
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • News & Politics

How the Left Is Becoming Reactionary

  • March 4, 2021
  • Joseph Kay
View Post
  • News & Politics

r/WallStreetBets Was Never David

  • February 24, 2021
  • Jill Risberg
View Post
  • News & Politics

The Impossibilities of Joe Biden’s COVID-Riddled America

  • January 31, 2021
  • Kenneth Kim
View Post
  • News & Politics

The Ideology Behind Anti-Vax Mommy Bloggers and QAnon Followers 

  • January 25, 2021
  • Cierra Bettens
View Post
  • News & Politics

Why Do Leftist Men Still Hate Women?

  • January 20, 2021
  • Sarah Bennett
View Post
  • News & Politics

Trump’s America Is Nothing New, But I Hope We Learn From It.

  • January 8, 2021
  • Simisola Fagbemi
View Post
  • News & Politics

The Day Georgia Made History, Again.

  • January 7, 2021
  • Raven Yamamoto
View Post
  • News & Politics

In Defense of Compulsory Voting

  • November 12, 2020
  • Madeleine Burgess

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    How the Left Is Becoming Reactionary
    • March 4, 2021
  • 2
    Sexual Empowerment or Reckless Endangerment?
    • March 2, 2021
  • 3
    What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?
    • March 1, 2021
  • 4
    Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain
    • February 28, 2021
  • 5
    “Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020
    • February 28, 2021
Recent Posts
  • Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino
    • February 27, 2021
  • Why You Should Reject Music Elitism
    • February 26, 2021
  • Middle School Ends, But “Pen15” Is Forever 
    • February 26, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (141)
  • Fashion & Beauty (31)
  • Life (133)
  • News & Politics (70)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (68)
Search
Instagram
The left is becoming reactionary. Blame it on the proliferation of liberalism or whatever, but you can’t deny that a lot of leftists today constantly moralize, seeing personal flaws as akin to structural ones. Instead of politics of reaction, we should be practicing politics of actions. As @kosherwhitewine writes, “Instead of treating leftism like an inclusive club, we must treat it as it’s meant to be—as a collective banner under which we march toward the liberation of all people. We don’t break each other down; we build each other up, standing together, fighting together.” Read about it on Lithium now 🗣
OnlyFans, selling worn underwear, sex work—are these acts of sexual empowerment or reckless endangerment? As Modesty Sanchez writes, “Because OnlyFans creators are portrayed as entrepreneurs taking control of their image and brand, the role that the platform itself plays is often obscured and dismissed, especially since the company prefers to hide behind the feminist, sex-positive glow emanating from the sex workers that have flocked to the site.” Often, the dangers of online and IRL sex work are simply swept to the side while corporate exploitation is covered up by a girl boss narrative. Read the latest on Lithium now ⚡️
What’s the point of “Fake Accounts”? Written by Lauren Oyler, Fake Accounts is a perfect addition to the list of much-overhyped millennial reading: Normal People, Bad Feminist, How to Do Nothing, etc. And if Oyler wasn’t such a harsh critic of that specific literary circle, this novel would just be another pretty well-written, unmoving book. But Oyler has gone after too many media darlings like Sally Rooney, Jia Tolentino and Roxane Gay in open takedowns that center on her distaste for moralizing, self-absorbed, digital-first writing. Read Lithium writer @katwilliiams take on this book, live on the site now 📚
Britney Spears, Tessica Brown “Gorilla Glue Girl,” and trauma porn all have something in common—they are representations of our fascination with women’s pain. In @tamaravjones’s latest piece for Lithium, she points out that “It’s up to readers to support better journalism and think about the consequences before sharing their unfiltered hot takes on social media. Britney Spears’ legal battle will continue and inevitably, someone else will take Tessica Brown’s spot as the internet’s main character, and I can only hope that we manage to break this cycle before someone else gets hurt.” Live on Lithium now 💫
Playboi Carti’s newest album Whole Lotta Red is the rapper’s ARTPOP. While it’s different from a lot of the rap dominating the Billboard 100, Carti does something a lot of mainstream acts are afraid to do: experiment. Lithium writer @kaiya.shunyata dives deep into Whole Lotta Red and discusses how the album, like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP, is a fantastic work of exploration and departure from the rap that mostly dominated 2020. Read about it now 🎧
When you’re first getting into film, you tend to hear the same names repeated over and over again: Fincher, Scorsese, and, most of all, Tarantino. But when @kaiya.shunyata rewatched his directorial debut Reservoir Dogs, she couldn’t help but think of his mistreatment of actresses (notably, Uma Thurman), his use of the N-word in films, sprinkled in like a garnish he and his fans can’t live without, and decades of controversies. She writes, “It’s become impossible to ignore the way Tarantino has been worshipped, while simultaneously not changing the things for which he’s been criticized.” Read about it on Lithium now 🎬
Middle school sux. Hulu’s Pen15 follows thirteen-year-old best friends Maya and Anna as they tackle an endless seventh-grade year. From day one, they face humiliations that only strike when you are thirteen, like bad haircuts and periods. But Pen15 sets itself apart from all the other middle school dramas by not only having good stories and actors, but drawing attention to the fact that even performing thirteen is a complex thing. Read about it now on Lithium, written by Jade Stillwell 📚
We’re all culprits in contributing to the shame and embarrassment that have become synonymous with listening to specific artists. Rex Orange County has become the unofficial pinnacle of a wannabe-indie girl who’s a regular Urban Outfitters patron. A Smiths fan is egotistical and decidedly unable to get laid. Bon Iver attracts the coffee shop connoisseur with a God complex. @elliergreenberg’s latest is all about why you should reject music elitism— this one is a must-read. Live on Lithium now 🎵
@holt.sheena’s latest piece is an ode to garage bands and punk shows past. She writes, “I loved every part of it—the moshing (which I observed, perplexed, from the sidelines), the music, the sense of belonging.” Read her latest piece on Lithium now 🎸

Input your search keywords and press Enter.