Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Followers
Followers
Lithium Magazine
Lithium Magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • Editors
    • Writers
    • Artists
    • Photographers
  • Contact
    • Work With Us
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Read
    • Sex & Love
    • Culture & Entertainment
    • News & Politics
    • Life
    • Photography
  • Life

What Does It Mean to Be a Sell-Out in 2020?

  • May 22, 2020
  • One comment
  • 4 minute read
  • Johanna Sommer

For artists, selling out used to be a death sentence. It could cause a shift from devoted fans to pitchfork protesters, like when Nirvana signed with major label DGC or Bob Dylan went electric. Merriam-Webster’s second verbal definition for “sell-out” reads, “to betray one’s cause or associates especially for personal gain.” But what does that mean in 2020? 

Thanks to the massive rise of social media, everyday people can now easily become brand advertisers. Anyone with even a minor following has the potential to promote a product and in turn get a monetary benefit in the form of physical products, discounts, or cash. This is where the term “influencer” comes from—it refers to someone who has the power to affect others’ purchasing decisions because of their authority, knowledge, position, or relationship with their audience. But what exactly are they influencing? 

There seem to be two sides to the influencer argument. On one end, it’s brought a more contemporary spin to the term “self-made,” enabling anyone to make a primary or extra stream of income through their social media efforts. On the other hand, there seems to be very little research or care as to whether the brand one is promoting has their best interest or values in mind, as well as that of their followers.

Take, for example, how influencers and celebrities alike have continued to promote and increase fast fashion. According to the Fashion Retail Academy, 54% of people believe influencers have at least partly caused an increase in fast fashion, including 73% of those in the 18-24 age range. In 2019, the mega fast-fashion brand Fashion Nova spent more than $40 million on “influencer marketing.” This same brand was the subject of controversy at the end of 2019 when The New York Times published a report on illegally underpaid factory workers and stolen clothing designs from the likes of Versace and Kim Kardashian, as well as other damning information. And yet, the incentive to become a #NovaBabe causes this information to be overlooked as their sales keep increasing. 

Fans once saw their favorite artists embracing big business as a moral breach—an act of hypocrisy, as what they preached in their work was compromised by the prospects of economic gain and broader exposure. Some see influencing as a proper reward for those they love and admire—artists can be compensated for their efforts while enabling their work to reach a larger audience than they may not have otherwise. Others consider influencing a complete sacrifice of moral integrity and authenticity. 

In terms of music, the debate of selling out began to dissolve in 1999 with the rise of Napster, a first-of-its-kind internet software that allowed users to share audio files, or songs, as MP3s. Artists began to need economic assistance for their efforts with the decline of album sales, a dilemma that has only increased with the popularization of streaming services. 

With the end of the common use of “sell-out” as a derogatory term, the ethical concerns it stood for faded as well. For the general public, or the 176 million people that follow Kylie Jenner on Instagram, being the face of a brand is considered attractive and desirable; in other words, it symbolizes a person has “made it.” This logic indicates how late-stage capitalism has once again demonstrated one of its greatest defenses: to have the people not only defend the system, but aspire to work for it. 

All this being said, there are certainly examples of sustainable, cruelty-free products that are being promoted on social media, and influencers who do use and research products before giving their seal of approval. Brands like Reformation, Levi’s, Pact, and Everlane have utilized the influencer format while still maintaining ethical and transparent practices. It’s certainly possible to use the social media-influencer dynamic in a positive and impactful way, as there can be benefits for both brands and social-media users without taking advantage of influencer-follower relationships or normalizing harmful policies. 

When it comes to social media, power is given to the followers as to who or what becomes popular. If a value is put on ethical and moral transparency, then unethical promoters—or the contemporary sell-out—will have an increasingly small space, taking the power away from those that primarily seek personal and economic gain. Though it may be idealistic, consumption awareness and informed influencers could lead to improved products, as well as an improved environment and better treatment of workers. Thinking twice about what Instagram caption is ended with “#ad” might not just benefit the individual, but the world.

 

By Johanna Sommer

Illustration by Alia Wilhelm for Vice

Related Topics
  • capitalism
  • influencer
  • internet
  • Johanna Sommer
  • money
  • social media
  • technology
Previous Article
  • Fashion & Beauty

Beauty Can Fuck Off. I’m Ugly And Proud.

  • May 19, 2020
  • Zoey Hickman
View Post
Next Article
  • Culture & Entertainment

Call Her Daddy Is Better Without Sofia

  • May 23, 2020
  • Katherine Williams
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Life

We’re Not Really Strangers Makes Me Feel Held

  • March 5, 2021
  • Natalie Geisel
View Post
  • Life

Foucault, Data, and Human Intimacy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism

  • February 24, 2021
  • Cierra Bettens
View Post
  • Life

When Having Fun Feels Wrong

  • February 22, 2021
  • Jack Loney
View Post
  • Life

TikTok Is Offering a Community for Ex-Mormons Everywhere

  • February 19, 2021
  • Logan Cross
View Post
  • Life

Tornadoes and Me: Fear, Fascination, and Falling Somewhere in Between

  • February 15, 2021
  • Gabriella Ferrigine
View Post
  • Life

Gen Z, Stop Glamorizing Old Money

  • February 9, 2021
  • Sophia Peyser
View Post
  • Life

Pandemic Parties: The New Normal of COVID-Safe Fun 

  • February 5, 2021
  • Alice Garnett
View Post
  • Life

Understanding Body Neutrality with Therapist Ashlee Bennett

  • February 2, 2021
  • Madeleine Burgess
1 comment
  1. Ashley says:
    May 23, 2020 at 2:16 am

    Absolutely loved this piece.

    Back in the day, I’d always been incredibly perplexed by the “sell-out” argument. Such accusations were invariably made by the very same people who got bent out of shape when “their” artists achieved mainstream popularity.

    As far as I was concerned, if an artist’s work and resultant popularity were based on strong anti-capitalist themes, then game on with calling them names if they start appearing in Super Bowl commercials.

    But if that wasn’t the the case, then why were we so harsh on artists and musicians whenever their attempts to financially benefit from their talents were in any way transparent?

    It’s as if some people needed their music heroes to fit some warped, romantic mold where the artists were doing it a) purely for the love of their craft, and b) only for the enjoyment of the listener in question and their hand-picked, like-minded, like-dressed community. (God forbid if you were a gritty band looking to pay some bills.)

    Although the author rightly points out that the advent of Napster slowed the pejorative use of the term, what Parker and Fanning really did was lift the skirt on the fact that the need for everyone’s favorite musicians to find new ways to monetize their artistic output meant that they were already “sell-outs.”

    But even with the abatement of using “sell-out” as a barb, that’s not to say that using one’s influencer status to push products in 2020 makes you impervious to legitimate criticism. My recent favorite was Jimmy Traina at SI.com recently referring to Tom Brady shilling “immunity” supplements during the pandemic as “so gross.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Featured Posts
  • 1
    We’re Not Really Strangers Makes Me Feel Held
    • March 5, 2021
  • 2
    How the Left Is Becoming Reactionary
    • March 4, 2021
  • 3
    Sexual Empowerment or Reckless Endangerment?
    • March 2, 2021
  • 4
    What’s the Point of “Fake Accounts”?
    • March 1, 2021
  • 5
    Oops!… We Did It Again: Why We Get Off on Women’s Pain
    • February 28, 2021
Recent Posts
  • “Whole Lotta Red”: A Feverish and Avant-Garde End to 2020
    • February 28, 2021
  • Blind Worship and the Films of Quentin Tarantino
    • February 27, 2021
  • Why You Should Reject Music Elitism
    • February 26, 2021
Categories
  • Culture & Entertainment (141)
  • Fashion & Beauty (31)
  • Life (134)
  • News & Politics (70)
  • Photography (63)
  • Sex & Love (68)
Search
Instagram
@nat.geisel discovered @werenotreallystrangers one month into quarantine, virtually getting to know while concurrently falling in love with her girlfriend at the time, by playing their free, downloadable quarantine edition with her over FaceTime. We’re Not Really Strangers reminds us that even through sadness, anxiety, and emotions we can’t exactly name, we are all trying our best. Check out the latest on Lithium now ♥️
The left is becoming reactionary. Blame it on the proliferation of liberalism or whatever, but you can’t deny that a lot of leftists today constantly moralize, seeing personal flaws as akin to structural ones. Instead of politics of reaction, we should be practicing politics of actions. As @kosherwhitewine writes, “Instead of treating leftism like an inclusive club, we must treat it as it’s meant to be—as a collective banner under which we march toward the liberation of all people. We don’t break each other down; we build each other up, standing together, fighting together.” Read about it on Lithium now 🗣
OnlyFans, selling worn underwear, sex work—are these acts of sexual empowerment or reckless endangerment? As Modesty Sanchez writes, “Because OnlyFans creators are portrayed as entrepreneurs taking control of their image and brand, the role that the platform itself plays is often obscured and dismissed, especially since the company prefers to hide behind the feminist, sex-positive glow emanating from the sex workers that have flocked to the site.” Often, the dangers of online and IRL sex work are simply swept to the side while corporate exploitation is covered up by a girl boss narrative. Read the latest on Lithium now ⚡️
What’s the point of “Fake Accounts”? Written by Lauren Oyler, Fake Accounts is a perfect addition to the list of much-overhyped millennial reading: Normal People, Bad Feminist, How to Do Nothing, etc. And if Oyler wasn’t such a harsh critic of that specific literary circle, this novel would just be another pretty well-written, unmoving book. But Oyler has gone after too many media darlings like Sally Rooney, Jia Tolentino and Roxane Gay in open takedowns that center on her distaste for moralizing, self-absorbed, digital-first writing. Read Lithium writer @katwilliiams take on this book, live on the site now 📚
Britney Spears, Tessica Brown “Gorilla Glue Girl,” and trauma porn all have something in common—they are representations of our fascination with women’s pain. In @tamaravjones’s latest piece for Lithium, she points out that “It’s up to readers to support better journalism and think about the consequences before sharing their unfiltered hot takes on social media. Britney Spears’ legal battle will continue and inevitably, someone else will take Tessica Brown’s spot as the internet’s main character, and I can only hope that we manage to break this cycle before someone else gets hurt.” Live on Lithium now 💫
Playboi Carti’s newest album Whole Lotta Red is the rapper’s ARTPOP. While it’s different from a lot of the rap dominating the Billboard 100, Carti does something a lot of mainstream acts are afraid to do: experiment. Lithium writer @kaiya.shunyata dives deep into Whole Lotta Red and discusses how the album, like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP, is a fantastic work of exploration and departure from the rap that mostly dominated 2020. Read about it now 🎧
When you’re first getting into film, you tend to hear the same names repeated over and over again: Fincher, Scorsese, and, most of all, Tarantino. But when @kaiya.shunyata rewatched his directorial debut Reservoir Dogs, she couldn’t help but think of his mistreatment of actresses (notably, Uma Thurman), his use of the N-word in films, sprinkled in like a garnish he and his fans can’t live without, and decades of controversies. She writes, “It’s become impossible to ignore the way Tarantino has been worshipped, while simultaneously not changing the things for which he’s been criticized.” Read about it on Lithium now 🎬
Middle school sux. Hulu’s Pen15 follows thirteen-year-old best friends Maya and Anna as they tackle an endless seventh-grade year. From day one, they face humiliations that only strike when you are thirteen, like bad haircuts and periods. But Pen15 sets itself apart from all the other middle school dramas by not only having good stories and actors, but drawing attention to the fact that even performing thirteen is a complex thing. Read about it now on Lithium, written by Jade Stillwell 📚
We’re all culprits in contributing to the shame and embarrassment that have become synonymous with listening to specific artists. Rex Orange County has become the unofficial pinnacle of a wannabe-indie girl who’s a regular Urban Outfitters patron. A Smiths fan is egotistical and decidedly unable to get laid. Bon Iver attracts the coffee shop connoisseur with a God complex. @elliergreenberg’s latest is all about why you should reject music elitism— this one is a must-read. Live on Lithium now 🎵

Input your search keywords and press Enter.